纽约时报采访Christopher Alexander大师

jeffyan77 2003-07-16 04:12:04
下面是纽约时报采访Christopher Alexander大师的报道,遗憾的是有很多地方对面向对象的软件设计讲得很不准确。大家可以评论一下。

Architecture's Irascible Reformer

July 12, 2003 By EMILY EAKIN


ARUNDEL, England - Moss grows from the steep, pitched roof
of the West Dean Gardens visitors' center. Carefully
trained grape vines hug its walls. And the facade,
approached by a curving gravel path, is a pleasing tapestry
of flint, brick, concrete and Portland stone.

Over all, the effect is quaint. The center, which houses a
gift shop and a cafeteria for the 35-acre gardens next
door, could have been plucked from the pages of a fairy
tale - a primmer English version of "Hansel and Gretel."

But to Christopher Alexander, the architect who designed
it, the center represents something much less whimsical: a
small social revolution.

For nearly four decades, Mr. Alexander, 66, an emeritus
professor of architecture at the University of California
at Berkeley, has been waging a quixotic campaign of
messianic ambition: to heal the world by reforming the way
it builds.

Humanity, he says, is ailing. And the built world is both
source and symptom of its disease. Where there should be
beautiful buildings in harmony with nature, he says, there
is mostly "architecture which is against life" instead,
"insane, image-ridden, hollow."

By this, Mr. Alexander means not only strip malls, office
parks and tract homes, but also much of what is fawned over
these days by highbrow critics. In his view, the recent
spate of flashy confections by big-name stars - from Frank
Gehry's glittering Guggenheim Bilbao to Rem Koolhaas's
interactive Prada boutique in SoHo - is not just
pretentious and sterile. It is actually making us ill.

"Architecture is a very strange field," Mr. Alexander said
over lunch here in the medieval town not far from West Dean
Gardens where he grew up and has lately been spending much
of his time. "It's almost as though they've induced a mass
psychosis in society by introducing a point of view that
has no common sense and no bearing on any deeper feeling."

But Mr. Alexander, a bearlike, weather-beaten man with
doleful blue eyes and rumpled khakis, is no mere
curmudgeon. Having made his diagnosis years ago, he has
dedicated himself to propounding the cure: an architecture
based on what he calls an objective science of beauty.

It's a mission that has put him starkly at odds with most
of his profession, where he is variously described as a
reactionary, a mystic or a Lear-like madman ranting on the
moors. It doesn't help matters that, like Shakespeare's
prickly king, Mr. Alexander is, as he apologetically put
it, "an excitable person": brilliant but conflict-prone.

"He's a self-proclaimed outsider," said the architect Peter
Eisenman, who famously debated him at the Graduate School
of Design at Harvard in 1982. "I think Chris unfortunately
fell off the radar screen some time ago. He got off into
being cranky."

But even his detractors concede him a grudging respect.
After all, Mr. Alexander's popular following is enormous.

Better known for his writings than his buildings, he is the
principal author of "A Pattern Language" (Oxford University
Press, 1977), one of the best-selling architectural
treatises of all time, still selling 10,000 copies annually
more than 25 years after it first appeared. His devotees
range from amateur home builders and community activist
groups to the Prince of Wales, who invited him to serve as
a trustee of his Institute for Architecture in London and
helped recruit him to design the visitors' center at West
Dean Gardens.

Among computer programmers, he has attained near-guru
status. Will Wright, the creator of "The Sims," the
nation's most popular computer game, routinely cites him as
a major influence. And he's an unlikely inspiration behind
a powerful movement in software design known as
object-oriented programming.

Now Mr. Alexander's iconoclastic reputation is likely to
grow some more. This spring, he finally completed his
four-volume, 2,150-page magnum opus: "The Nature of Order:
An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the
Universe." After laboring over it for 27 years, Mr.
Alexander had a falling out with his editors at Oxford
University Press and is now publishing the work himself
through his Center for Environmental Structure, a nonprofit
organization in Berkeley dedicated to promoting his ideas.
(Sun Microsystems contributed money to help defray printing
costs.)

Much more than a do-it-yourself construction manual (though
it is that, too), "The Nature of Order" is a grandiose,
polemical, sumptuously illustrated and utterly singular
inquiry into what Mr. Alexander calls "first principles":
the essence of life itself. Available since May for $75,
the first volume, "The Phenomenon of Life," has already
sold 4,000 copies. In it, he lays out his view that beauty
is a matter neither of taste nor opinion but rather an
inherent attribute of living things. But Mr. Alexander's
definition of life is hardly the standard one.

"Life is not a limited mechanical concept which applies to
self-reproducing biological machines," he declares in the
introduction (which, like the rest of the volume, appears
to have been only lightly copy-edited). "It is a quality
which inheres in space itself, and applies to every brick,
every stone, every person, every physical structure of any
kind at all, that appears in space. Each thing has life."

He describes 15 "structural features" fundamental
geometries of order - that signal vitality in plants,
animals and objects. If respected by architects and
developers, he argues, these features - which include
"strong centers," "alternating repetition" and "levels of
scale" - would result in a built world that is both
beautiful and alive. To the untrained eye, however, the
concepts are not necessarily intuitive. It may not be
obvious that - to take just a few of the book's hundreds of
examples - the Great Mosque of Kairouan in Tunisia has
"strong centers," while a 1971 Minnesota house by Bruce
Goff does not. Or that a Shaker cabinet radiates "the most
beautiful inner calm," while a pair of carved wood Italian
chairs from the 1920's are "gross and utterly lacking in
inner calm."
...全文
113 3 打赏 收藏 转发到动态 举报
写回复
用AI写文章
3 条回复
切换为时间正序
请发表友善的回复…
发表回复
keen_9 2003-07-22
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
good
lvkai 2003-07-16
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
hehe
jeffyan77 2003-07-16
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复

Reviewing a galley of "The Phenomenon of Life" in the
journal Architectural Record in May 2002, William S.
Saunders, the editor of The Harvard Design Magazine and an
admirer of Mr. Alexander's early work, called the book
"full of contradictions, foggy generalities and extreme and
unsupported assertions." He compared Mr. Alexander to
Casaubon, the deluded scholar in "Middlemarch" who devotes
fruitless years to compiling a grand synthesis of all the
world's myths.

The architect Moshe Safdie, a close friend of Mr.
Alexander's for 40 years, worries that some readers may be
put off by the book's mystical tone. "This sense that there
are intrinsic qualities, difficult to explain, but which
you somehow feel when you are in the presence of great
beauty," he said. "He wants you to accept it, grasp it and
follow it almost as a religious teaching."

Another stumbling block for architects is Mr. Alexander's
idiosyncratic building style, he continued, adding: "People
go from the ideas, which they could interpret freely, to
the solutions, which they see as somewhat anachronistic,
somewhat craft-related, stylistically somewhat Victorian.
They see him as a reactionary."

It wasn't always this way. Mr. Alexander once ranked among
the profession's vanguard. Born Wolfgang Christian Johann
Alexander to Austrian parents who were archaeologists in
Vienna, he fled with his family to England during the
Anschluss. They eventually settled in Arundel, where his
mother and father taught high school. Mr. Alexander
graduated from Cambridge University with degrees in math
and architecture.

Asked as part of one assignment to design a house, he
instead submitted a spoof of the formalist theory he had
been taught: a glass box slashed by giant brick walls. "A
completely abstract, pointless notion," he said. To his
amazement, the head of the department called him into his
office to congratulate him. "He said, `Christopher, my boy,
this is exactly what we want,' " Mr. Alexander recalled. "I
thought, Oh my God, I've walked into the nut house."

In 1958, he left England for what he rightly guessed would
be the more open, experimental culture of Harvard. For his
Ph.D. dissertation in architecture, published in 1964 as
"Notes on the Synthesis of Form," he proposed a rigorous
and - for the decade - technologically precocious approach
to architectural design involving algorithms and computer
analysis. It earned him instant renown.

He also spent time living in India. When the Indian
government asked him to help rebuild a village that had
been displaced by a dam, he reluctantly declined.

"I knew that the village would be meaningless if it weren't
generated by the people in the village," he explained. "And
I didn't know how to harness the energy and thought of the
people to create their village. I thought: I've got to
figure out how that is done."

His solution was "A Pattern Language," written over nearly
a decade with the help of five collaborators, colleagues
and students at Berkeley, where, in 1963, Mr. Alexander had
become a professor. Printed on nearly 1,200 pages of
wafer-thin paper, the book had the look, weight and
commanding moral tone of a Bible.

Arguing that homes, neighborhoods and towns should be
designed not by professionals but by the people who live in
them, the authors presented the book as an all-purpose
how-to guide for creating a global utopia: the built world
boiled down to 253 patterns. From "country towns" (pattern
6) and "green streets" (pattern 51) to "six-foot balcony"
(pattern 167), no design feature was too big or too small
to merit detailed consideration.

Buildings should be no more than four stories high (pattern
21), the authors stipulated. Town squares should include
paved surfaces for dancing in the street (pattern 63). And
people should sleep facing east (pattern 138), for optimal
well-being.

These were not arbitrary rules, Mr. Alexander and his
collaborators insisted. Rather, they were "archetypal"
patterns, "so deeply rooted in the nature of things, that
it seems likely that they will be a part of human nature,
and human action, as much in 500 years, as they are today."


Melding a 1960's feel-good social philosophy with a
rigorous structuralism, the book had broad appeal. Like
Jane Jacobs's "Life and Death of Great American Cities"
(1961), "A Pattern Language" offered a promising
alternative to the sterility and exhaustion of modernist
architecture.

By the early 1980's, computer scientists were eagerly
discussing the book as well. In Mr. Alexander's patterns,
programmers saw the solution to a software design problem
that had long plagued the field. According to the dominant
approach at the time, whenever a program was needed, one
would be written from scratch, a method that tended to
produce unwieldy and bug-ridden software. Inspired by "A
Pattern Language," computer scientists discovered they
could get more efficient and reliable results if they
thought of programs as assemblies of predefined code
patterns instead. To the thousands of programmers who use
this approach today, said Richard Gabriel, a computer
scientist at Sun Microsystems and a leading advocate of the
software patterns approach, "Chris is a revered cult
figure."

In his own field, his reputation has proved more fickle. By
the 1980's, structuralist theory had given way on American
campuses to the more playful and rule-free dispensations of
deconstruction and postmodernism. At Berkeley, Mr.
Alexander came into increasing conflict with colleagues. He
says he and and his students were victims of intellectual
harassment. In 1985 he filed a formal complaint against the
university, charging it with violating his academic
freedom. Seven years later, the matter was quietly settled,
and in 1998, he retired.

But the embattled life seems to agree with Mr. Alexander,
who has been getting up at 2 a.m. to work on a new book,
"Deep Adaptation." Skeptics, he said cheerfully, would do
well to recall the success of "A Pattern Language." As he
put it: "Even the cautiously skeptical reader might say:
`He did it once. Maybe it's possible that he's done it
again.' "

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/12/arts/design/12ALEX.html?ex=1059018101&ei=1&en=1dd165623370cd6c




内容概要:本文针对离网光伏直流微网中存在的功率供需失衡问题,提出了一种基于光伏最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)与锂离子储能系统双向削峰填谷协同控制的解决方案,并通过Simulink仿真平台进行了系统建模与验证。研究聚焦于间歇性光伏出力条件下48V直流母线电压的稳定控制,构建了包含光伏阵列、Boost DC-DC变换器、负载、双向DC-DC变换器及锂离子电池在内的完整系统架构。通过整合MPPT算法实现光伏出力的最大化捕获,同时设计储能系统的双向充放电闭环调控策略,在光照充足时储存多余电能,在光照不足或负载高峰时释放电能,从而实现“削峰填谷”,有效平衡系统功率,维持直流母线电压稳定。研究还融合了能量管理策略与电池充放电控制逻辑,提升了微网系统的能量自给率、运行稳定性及对复杂工况的适应能力。; 适合人群:具备电力电子、新能源系统、自动化或电气工程等相关专业背景,从事微电网、分布式能源系统、储能控制、光伏系统集成等方向研究的研究生、科研人员及工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①用于离网型直流微网能量管理系统的设计与仿真验证;②为光伏-储能协同控制策略的研究与优化提供理论依据和技术参考;③实现直流母线电压的精确稳定控制,提升储能系统利用效率,增强系统在光照波动和负载变化等复杂工况下的可靠性和鲁棒性。; 阅读建议:建议结合提供的Simulink仿真模型进行实践操作,重点关注MPPT算法(如扰动观察法或增量电导法)与储能系统充放电控制逻辑(如基于电压阈值或功率预测的充放电策略)之间的协同机制,深入理解能量管理策略的实现流程,并可通过修改光照强度、负载大小等参数,扩展研究不同运行场景下的系统性能表现。

51,408

社区成员

发帖
与我相关
我的任务
社区描述
Java相关技术讨论
javaspring bootspring cloud 技术论坛(原bbs)
社区管理员
  • Java相关社区
  • 小虚竹
  • 谙忆
加入社区
  • 近7日
  • 近30日
  • 至今
社区公告
暂无公告

试试用AI创作助手写篇文章吧