这个 The remote name could not be resolved 怎么解决?

anuosix 2013-11-09 08:40:17
var request = WebRequest.Create(new Uri(url)) as HttpWebRequest;
request.Proxy = WebRequest.DefaultWebProxy;
request.Proxy.Credentials = System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials;
if (request == null)
throw new Exception("Non HTTP WebRequest");
var response = request.GetResponse();
var resStream = response.GetResponseStream();
var resStreamReader = new StreamReader(resStream);
var resString = resStreamReader.ReadToEnd();
return resString;

上面是代码,错误出在红色字体部分
关键是不是每次访问都出现,而是不知道什么时候就出现错误了,各位大佬知道怎么解决么,谢谢了
...全文
5152 6 打赏 收藏 转发到动态 举报
写回复
用AI写文章
6 条回复
切换为时间正序
请发表友善的回复…
发表回复
我本微若凡尘 2015-12-28
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
这个问题怎么解决的你?
anuosix 2013-11-10
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
错误不是每次都出现,这个比较不爽
anuosix 2013-11-10
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
 HttpWebRequest WebRequestObject = (HttpWebRequest)HttpWebRequest.Create(strUrl);
                    WebResponse Response = WebRequestObject.GetResponse();
                    Stream WebStream = Response.GetResponseStream();
                    StreamReader Reader = new StreamReader(WebStream);
                    strPage = Reader.ReadToEnd();
anuosix 2013-11-10
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
引用 2 楼 happy09li 的回复:
是否有代理 ,,
这个代码是别人的,应该是没有吧,我用下面的代码也会出问题,救命啊大佬
熙风 2013-11-09
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
是否有代理 ,,
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
那个错似乎是域名无法解析,把域名换成IP,另外你设置了默认代理,也看下那个
A project model for the FreeBSD Project Niklas Saers Copyright © 2002-2005 Niklas Saers [ Split HTML / Single HTML ] Table of Contents Foreword 1 Overview 2 Definitions 2.1. Activity 2.2. Process 2.3. Hat 2.4. Outcome 2.5. FreeBSD 3 Organisational structure 4 Methodology model 4.1. Development model 4.2. Release branches 4.3. Model summary 5 Hats 5.1. General Hats 5.1.1. Contributor 5.1.2. Committer 5.1.3. Core Team 5.1.4. Maintainership 5.2. Official Hats 5.2.1. Documentation project manager 5.2.2. CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator 5.2.3. Internationalisation 5.2.4. Postmaster 5.2.5. Quality Assurance 5.2.6. Release Coordination 5.2.7. Public Relations & Corporate Liaison 5.2.8. Security Officer 5.2.9. Source Repository Manager 5.2.10. Election Manager 5.2.11. Web site Management 5.2.12. Ports Manager 5.2.13. Standards 5.2.14. Core Secretary 5.2.15. GNATS Administrator 5.2.16. Bugmeister 5.2.17. Donations Liaison Officer 5.2.18. Admin 5.3. Process dependent hats 5.3.1. Report originator 5.3.2. Bugbuster 5.3.3. Mentor 5.3.4. Vendor 5.3.5. Reviewers 5.3.6. CVSup Mirror Site Admin 6 Processes 6.1. Adding new and removing old committers 6.2. Adding/Removing an official CVSup Mirror 6.3. Committing code 6.4. Core election 6.5. Development of new features 6.6. Maintenance 6.7. Problem reporting 6.8. Reacting to misbehaviour 6.9. Release engineering 7 Tools 7.1. Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 7.2. CVSup 7.3. GNATS 7.4. Mailman 7.5. Perforce 7.6. Pretty Good Privacy 7.7. Secure Shell 8 Sub-projects 8.1. The Ports Subproject 8.2. The FreeBSD Documentation Project References List of Figures 3-1. The FreeBSD Project's structure 3-2. The FreeBSD Project's structure with committers in categories 4-1. Jørgenssen's model for change integration 4-2. The FreeBSD release tree 4-3. The overall development model 5-1. Overview of official hats 6-1. Process summary: adding a new committer 6-2. Process summary: removing a committer 6-3. Process summary: adding a CVSup mirror 6-4. Process summary: A committer commits code 6-5. Process summary: A contributor commits code 6-6. Process summary: Core elections 6-7. Jørgenssen's model for change integration 6-8. Process summary: problem reporting 6-9. Process summary: release engineering 8-1. Number of ports added between 1996 and 2005 Foreword Up until now, the FreeBSD project has released a number of described techniques to do different parts of work. However, a project model summarising how the project is structured is needed because of the increasing amount of project members. [1] This paper will provide such a project model and is donated to the FreeBSD Documentation project where it can evolve together with the project so that it can at any point in time reflect the way the project works. It is based on [Saers, 2003]. I would like to thank the following people for taking the time to explain things that were unclear to me and for proofreading the document. Andrey A. Chernov Bruce A. Mah Dag-Erling Smørgrav Giorgos Keramidas Ingvil Hovig Jesper Holck John Baldwin John Polstra Kirk McKusick Mark Linimon Marleen Devos Niels Jørgenssen Nik Clayton Poul-Henning Kamp Simon L. Nielsen Chapter 1 Overview A project model is a means to reduce the communications overhead in a project. As shown by [Brooks, 1995], increasing the number of project participants increases the communication in the project exponentionally. FreeBSD has during the past few year increased both its mass of active users and committers, and the communication in the project has risen accordingly. This project model will serve to reduce this overhead by providing an up-to-date description of the project. During the Core elections in 2002, Mark Murray stated “I am opposed to a long rule-book, as that satisfies lawyer-tendencies, and is counter to the technocentricity that the project so badly needs.” [FreeBSD, 2002B]. This project model is not meant to be a tool to justify creating impositions for developers, but as a tool to facilitate coordination. It is meant as a description of the project, with an overview of how the different processes are executed. It is an introduction to how the FreeBSD project works. The FreeBSD project model will be described as of July 1st, 2004. It is based on the Niels Jørgensen's paper [Jørgensen, 2001], FreeBSD's official documents, discussions on FreeBSD mailing lists and interviews with developers. After providing definitions of terms used, this document will outline the organisational structure (including role descriptions and communication lines), discuss the methodology model and after presenting the tools used for process control, it will present the defined processes. Finally it will outline major sub-projects of the FreeBSD project. [FreeBSD, 2002A, Section 1.2 and 1.3] give the vision and the architectural guidelines for the project. The vision is “To produce the best UNIX-like operating system package possible, with due respect to the original software tools ideology as well as usability, performance and stability.” The architectural guidelines help determine whether a problem that someone wants to be solved is within the scope of the project Chapter 2 Definitions 2.1. Activity An “activity” is an element of work performed during the course of a project [PMI, 2000]. It has an output and leads towards an outcome. Such an output can either be an input to another activity or a part of the process' delivery. 2.2. Process A “process” is a series of activities that lead towards a particular outcome. A process can consist of one or more sub-processes. An example of a process is software design. 2.3. Hat A “hat” is synonymous with role. A hat has certain responsibilities in a process and for the process outcome. The hat executes activities. It is well defined what issues the hat should be contacted about by the project members and people outside the project. 2.4. Outcome An “outcome” is the final output of the process. This is synonymous with deliverable, that is defined as “any measurable, tangible, verifiable outcome, result or item that must be produced to complete a project or part of a project. Often used more narrowly in reference to an external deliverable, which is a deliverable that is subject to approval by the project sponsor or customer” by [PMI, 2000]. Examples of outcomes are a piece of software, a decision made or a report written. 2.5. FreeBSD When saying “FreeBSD” we will mean the BSD derivative UNIX-like operating system FreeBSD, whereas when saying “the FreeBSD Project” we will mean the project organisation. Chapter 3 Organisational structure While no-one takes ownership of FreeBSD, the FreeBSD organisation is divided into core, committers and contributors and is part of the FreeBSD community that lives around it. Figure 3-1. The FreeBSD Project's structure Number of committers has been determined by going through CVS logs from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2004 and contributors by going through the list of contributions and problem reports. The main resource in the FreeBSD community is its developers: the committers and contributors. It is with their contributions that the project can move forward. Regular developers are referred to as contributors. As by January 1st, 2003, there are an estimated 5500 contributors on the project. Committers are developers with the privilege of being able to commit changes. These are usually the most active developers who are willing to spend their time not only integrating their own code but integrating code submitted by the developers who do not have this privilege. They are also the developers who elect the core team, and they have access to closed discussions. The project can be grouped into four distinct separate parts, and most developers will focus their involvement in one part of FreeBSD. The four parts are kernel development, userland development, ports and documentation. When referring to the base system, both kernel and userland is meant. This split changes our triangle to look like this: Figure 3-2. The FreeBSD Project's structure with committers in categories Number of committers per area has been determined by going through CVS logs from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2004. Note that many committers work in multiple areas, making the total number higher than the real number of committers. The total number of committers at that time was 269. Committers fall into three groups: committers who are only concerned with one area of the project (for instance file systems), committers who are involved only with one sub-project and committers who commit to different parts of the code, including sub-projects. Because some committers work on different parts, the total number in the committers section of the triangle is higher than in the above triangle. The kernel is the main building block of FreeBSD. While the userland applications are protected against faults in other userland applications, the entire system is vulnerable to errors in the kernel. This, combined with the vast amount of dependencies in the kernel and that it is not easy to see all the consequences of a kernel change, demands developers with a relative full understanding of the kernel. Multiple development efforts in the kernel also requires a closer coordination than userland applications do. The core utilities, known as userland, provide the interface that identifies FreeBSD, both user interface, shared libraries and external interfaces to connecting clients. Currently, 162 people are involved in userland development and maintenance, many being maintainers for their own part of the code. Maintainership will be discussed in the Maintainership section. Documentation is handled by The FreeBSD Documentation Project and includes all documents surrounding the FreeBSD project, including the web pages. There were during 2004 101 people making commits to the FreeBSD Documentation Project. Ports is the collection of meta-data that is needed to make software packages build correctly on FreeBSD. An example of a port is the port for the web-browser Mozilla. It contains information about where to fetch the source, what patches to apply and how, and how the package should be installed on the system. This allows automated tools to fetch, build and install the package. As of this writing, there are more than 12600 ports available. [2] , ranging from web servers to games, programming languages and most of the application types that are in use on modern computers. Ports will be discussed further in the section The Ports Subproject. Chapter 4 Methodology model 4.1. Development model There is no defined model for how people write code in FreeBSD. However, Niels Jørgenssen has suggested a model of how written code is integrated into the project. Figure 4-1. Jørgenssen's model for change integration The “development release” is the FreeBSD-CURRENT ("-CURRENT") branch and the “production release” is the FreeBSD-STABLE branch ("-STABLE") [Jørgensen, 2001]. This is a model for one change, and shows that after coding, developers seek community review and try integrating it with their own systems. After integrating the change into the development release, called FreeBSD-CURRENT, it is tested by many users and developers in the FreeBSD community. After it has gone through enough testing, it is merged into the production release, called FreeBSD-STABLE. Unless each stage is finished successfully, the developer needs to go back and make modifications in the code and restart the process. To integrate a change with either -CURRENT or -STABLE is called making a commit. Jørgensen found that most FreeBSD developers work individually, meaning that this model is used in parallel by many developers on the different ongoing development efforts. A developer can also be working on multiple changes, so that while he is waiting for review or people to test one or more of his changes, he may be writing another change. As each commit represents an increment, this is a massively incremental model. The commits are in fact so frequent that during one year [3] , 85427 commits were made, making a daily average of 233 commits. Within the “code” bracket in Jørgensen's figure, each programmer has his own working style and follows his own development models. The bracket could very well have been called “development” as it includes requirements gathering and analysis, system and detailed design, implementation and verification. However, the only output from these stages is the source code or system documentation. From a stepwise model's perspective (such as the waterfall model), the other brackets can be seen as further verification and system integration. This system integration is also important to see if a change is accepted by the community. Up until the code is committed, the developer is free to choose how much to communicate about it to the rest of the project. In order for -CURRENT to work as a buffer (so that bright ideas that had some undiscovered drawbacks can be backed out) the minimum time a commit should be in -CURRENT before merging it to -STABLE is 3 days. Such a merge is referred to as an MFC (Merge From Current). It is important to notice the word “change”. Most commits do not contain radical new features, but are maintenance updates. The only exceptions from this model are security fixes and changes to features that are deprecated in the -CURRENT branch. In these cases, changes can be committed directly to the -STABLE branch. In addition to many people working on the project, there are many related projects to the FreeBSD Project. These are either projects developing brand new features, sub-projects or projects whose outcome is incorporated into FreeBSD [4]. These projects fit into the FreeBSD Project just like regular development efforts: they produce code that is integrated with the FreeBSD Project. However, some of them (like Ports and Documentation) have the privilege of being applicable to both branches or commit directly to both -CURRENT and -STABLE. There is no standards to how design should be done, nor is design collected in a centralised repository. The main design is that of 4.4BSD. [5] As design is a part of the “Code” bracket in Jørgenssen's model, it is up to every developer or sub-project how this should be done. Even if the design should be stored in a central repository, the output from the design stages would be of limited use as the differences of methodologies would make them poorly if at all interoperable. For the overall design of the project, the project relies on the sub-projects to negotiate fit interfaces between each other rather than to dictate interfacing. 4.2. Release branches The releases of FreeBSD is best illustrated by a tree with many branches where each major branch represents a major version. Minor versions are represented by branches of the major branches. In the following release tree, arrows that follow one-another in a particular direction represent a branch. Boxes with full lines and diamonds represent official releases. Boxes with dotted lines represent the development branch at that time. Security branches are represented by ovals. Diamonds differ from boxes in that they represent a fork, meaning a place where a branch splits into two branches where one of the branches becomes a sub-branch. For example, at 4.0-RELEASE the 4.0-CURRENT branch split into 4-STABLE and 5.0-CURRENT. At 4.5-RELEASE, the branch forked off a security branch called RELENG_4_5. Figure 4-2. The FreeBSD release tree The latest -CURRENT version is always referred to as -CURRENT, while the latest -STABLE release is always referred to as -STABLE. In this figure, -STABLE refers to 4-STABLE while -CURRENT refers to 5.0-CURRENT following 5.0-RELEASE. [FreeBSD, 2002E] A “major release” is always made from the -CURRENT branch. However, the -CURRENT branch does not need to fork at that point in time, but can focus on stabilising. An example of this is that following 3.0-RELEASE, 3.1-RELEASE was also a continuation of the -CURRENT-branch, and -CURRENT did not become a true development branch until this version was released and the 3-STABLE branch was forked. When -CURRENT returns to becoming a development branch, it can only be followed by a major release. 5-STABLE is predicted to be forked off 5.0-CURRENT at around 5.3-RELEASE. It is not until 5-STABLE is forked that the development branch will be branded 6.0-CURRENT. A “minor release” is made from the -CURRENT branch following a major release, or from the -STABLE branch. Following and including, 4.3-RELEASE[6], when a minor release has been made, it becomes a “security branch”. This is meant for organisations that do not want to follow the -STABLE branch and the potential new/changed features it offers, but instead require an absolutely stable environment, only updating to implement security updates. [7] Each update to a security branch is called a “patchlevel”. For every security enhancement that is done, the patchlevel number is increased, making it easy for people tracking the branch to see what security enhancements they have implemented. In cases where there have been especially serious security flaws, an entire new release can be made from a security branch. An example of this is 4.6.2-RELEASE. 4.3. Model summary To summarise, the development model of FreeBSD can be seen as the following tree: Figure 4-3. The overall development model The tree of the FreeBSD development with ongoing development efforts and continuous integration. The tree symbolises the release versions with major versions spawning new main branches and minor versions being versions of the main branch. The top branch is the -CURRENT branch where all new development is integrated, and the -STABLE branch is the branch directly below it. Clouds of development efforts hang over the project where developers use the development models they see fit. The product of their work is then integrated into -CURRENT where it undergoes parallel debugging and is finally merged from -CURRENT into -STABLE. Security fixes are merged from -STABLE to the security branches. Chapter 5 Hats Many committers have a special area of responsibility. These roles are called hats [Losh, 2002]. These hats can be either project roles, such as public relations officer, or maintainer for a certain area of the code. Because this is a project where people give voluntarily of their spare time, people with assigned hats are not always available. They must therefore appoint a deputy that can perform the hat's role in his or her absence. The other option is to have the role held by a group. Many of these hats are not formalised. Formalised hats have a charter stating the exact purpose of the hat along with its privileges and responsibilities. The writing of such charters is a new part of the project, and has thus yet to be completed for all hats. These hat descriptions are not such a formalisation, rather a summary of the role with links to the charter where available and contact addresses, 5.1. General Hats 5.1.1. Contributor A Contributor contributes to the FreeBSD project either as a developer, as an author, by sending problem reports, or in other ways contributing to the progress of the project. A contributor has no special privileges in the FreeBSD project. [FreeBSD, 2002F] 5.1.2. Committer A person who has the required privileges to add his code or documentation to the repository. A committer has made a commit within the past 12 months. [FreeBSD, 2000A] An active committer is a committer who has made an average of one commit per month during that time. It is worth noting that there are no technical barriers to prevent someone, once having gained commit privileges to the main- or a sub-project, to make commits in parts of that project's source the committer did not specifically get permission to modify. However, when wanting to make modifications to parts a committer has not been involved in before, he/she should read the logs to see what has happened in this area before, and also read the MAINTAINER file to see if the maintainer of this part has any special requests on how changes in the code should be made 5.1.3. Core Team The core team is elected by the committers from the pool of committers and serves as the board of directors of the FreeBSD project. It promotes active contributors to committers, assigns people to well-defined hats, and is the final arbiter of decisions involving which way the project should be heading. As by July 1st, 2004, core consisted of 9 members. Elections are held every two years. 5.1.4. Maintainership Maintainership means that that person is responsible for what is allowed to go into that area of the code and has the final say should disagreements over the code occur. This involves involves proactive work aimed at stimulating contributions and reactive work in reviewing commits. With the FreeBSD source comes the MAINTAINERS file that contains a one-line summary of how each maintainer would like contributions to be made. Having this notice and contact information enables developers to focus on the development effort rather than being stuck in a slow correspondence should the maintainer be unavailable for some time. If the maintainer is unavailable for an unreasonably long period of time, and other people do a significant amount of work, maintainership may be switched without the maintainer's approval. This is based on the stance that maintainership should be demonstrated, not declared. Maintainership of a particular piece of code is a hat that is not held as a group. 5.2. Official Hats The official hats in the FreeBSD Project are hats that are more or less formalised and mainly administrative roles. They have the authority and responsibility for their area. The following illustration shows the responsibility lines. After this follows a description of each hat, including who it is held by. Figure 5-1. Overview of official hats All boxes consist of groups of committers, except for the dotted boxes where the holders are not necessarily committers. The flattened circles are sub-projects and consist of both committers and non-committers of the main project. 5.2.1. Documentation project manager The FreeBSD Documentation Project architect is responsible for defining and following up documentation goals for the committers in the Documentation project. Hat held by: The DocEng team . The DocEng Charter. 5.2.2. CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator The CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator coordinates all the CVSup Mirror Site Admins to ensure that they are distributing current versions of the software, that they have the capacity to update themselves when major updates are in progress, and making it easy for the general public to find their closest CVSup mirror. Hat currently held by: John Polstra . 5.2.3. Internationalisation The Internationalisation hat is responsible for coordinating the localisation efforts of the FreeBSD kernel and userland utilities. The translation effort are coordinated by The FreeBSD Documentation Project. The Internationalisation hat should suggest and promote standards and guidelines for writing and maintaining the software in a fashion that makes it easier to translate. Hat currently available. 5.2.4. Postmaster The Postmaster is responsible for mail being correctly delivered to the committers' email address. He is also responsible for ensuring that the mailing lists work and should take measures against possible disruptions of mail such as having troll-, spam- and virus-filters. Hat currently held by: David Wolfskill . 5.2.5. Quality Assurance The responsibilities of this role are to manage the quality assurance measures. Hat currently held by: Robert Watson . 5.2.6. Release Coordination The responsibilities of the Release Engineering Team are Setting, publishing and following a release schedule for official releases Documenting and formalising release engineering procedures Creation and maintenance of code branches Coordinating with the Ports and Documentation teams to have an updated set of packages and documentation released with the new releases Coordinating with the Security team so that pending releases are not affected by recently disclosed vulnerabilities. Further information about the development process is available in the release engineering section. Hat held by: the Release Engineering team , currently headed by Murray Stokely . The Release Engineering Charter. 5.2.7. Public Relations & Corporate Liaison The Public Relations & Corporate Liaison's responsibilities are: Making press statements when happenings that are important to the FreeBSD Project happen. Being the official contact person for corporations that are working close with the FreeBSD Project. Take steps to promote FreeBSD within both the Open Source community and the corporate world. Handle the “freebsd-advocacy” mailing list. This hat is currently not occupied. 5.2.8. Security Officer The Security Officer's main responsibility is to coordinate information exchange with others in the security community and in the FreeBSD project. The Security Officer is also responsible for taking action when security problems are reported and promoting proactive development behaviour when it comes to security. Because of the fear that information about vulnerabilities may leak out to people with malicious intent before a patch is available, only the Security Officer, consisting of an officer, a deputy and two Core team members, receive sensitive information about security issues. However, to create or implement a patch, the Security Officer has the Security Officer Team to help do the work. Hat held by: the Security Officer , currently headed by Colin Percival . The Security Officer and The Security Officer Team's charter. 5.2.9. Source Repository Manager The Source Repository Manager is the only one who is allowed to directly modify the repository without using the CVS tool. It is his/her responsibility to ensure that technical problems that arise in the repository are resolved quickly. The source repository manager has the authority to back out commits if this is necessary to resolve a CVS technical problem. Hat held by: the Source Repository Manager , currently headed by Peter Wemm . 5.2.10. Election Manager The Election Manager is responsible for the Core election process. The manager is responsible for running and maintaining the election system, and is the final authority should minor unforseen events happen in the election process. Major unforseen events have to be discussed with the Core team Hat held only during elections. 5.2.11. Web site Management The Web site Management hat is responsible for coordinating the rollout of updated web pages on mirrors around the world, for the overall structure of the primary web site and the system it is running upon. The management needs to coordinate the content with The FreeBSD Documentation Project and acts as maintainer for the “www” tree. Hat held by: the FreeBSD Webmasters . 5.2.12. Ports Manager The Ports Manager acts as a liaison between The Ports Subproject and the core project, and all requests from the project should go to the ports manager. Hat held by: the Ports Management Team , 5.2.13. Standards The Standards hat is responsible for ensuring that FreeBSD complies with the standards it is committed to , keeping up to date on the development of these standards and notifying FreeBSD developers of important changes that allows them to take a proactive role and decrease the time between a standards update and FreeBSD's compliancy. Hat currently held by: Garrett Wollman . 5.2.14. Core Secretary The Core Secretary's main responsibility is to write drafts to and publish the final Core Reports. The secretary also keeps the core agenda, thus ensuring that no balls are dropped unresolved. Hat currently held by: Joel Dahl . 5.2.15. GNATS Administrator The GNATS Administrator is responsible for ensuring that the maintenance database is in working order, that the entries are correctly categorised and that there are no invalid entries. Hat currently held by: Ceri Davies and Mark Linimon . 5.2.16. Bugmeister The Bugmeister is the person in charge of the problem report group. Hat currently held by: Ceri Davies and Mark Linimon . 5.2.17. Donations Liaison Officer The task of the donations liason officer is to match the developers with needs with people or organisations willing to make a donation. The Donations Liason Charter is available here Hat held by: the Donations Liaison Office , currently headed by Michael W. Lucas . 5.2.18. Admin (Also called “FreeBSD Cluster Admin”) The admin team consists of the people responsible for administrating the computers that the project relies on for its distributed work and communication to be synchronised. It consists mainly of those people who have physical access to the servers. Hat held by: the Admin team , currently headed by Mark Murray 5.3. Process dependent hats 5.3.1. Report originator The person originally responsible for filing a Problem Report. 5.3.2. Bugbuster A person who will either find the right person to solve the problem, or close the PR if it is a duplicate or otherwise not an interesting one. 5.3.3. Mentor A mentor is a committer who takes it upon him/her to introduce a new committer to the project, both in terms of ensuring the new committers setup is valid, that the new committer knows the available tools required in his/her work and that the new committer knows what is expected of him/her in terms of behaviour. 5.3.4. Vendor The person(s) or organisation whom external code comes from and whom patches are sent to. 5.3.5. Reviewers People on the mailing list where the request for review is posted. 5.3.6. CVSup Mirror Site Admin A CVSup Mirror Site Admin has accesses to a server that he/she uses to mirror the CVS repository. The admin works with the CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator to ensure the site remains up-to-date and is following the general policy of official mirror sites. Chapter 6 Processes The following section will describe the defined project processes. Issues that are not handled by these processes happen on an ad-hoc basis based on what has been customary to do in similar cases. 6.1. Adding new and removing old committers The Core team has the responsibility of giving and removing commit privileges to contributors. This can only be done through a vote on the core mailing list. The ports and documentation sub-projects can give commit privileges to people working on these projects, but have to date not removed such privileges. Normally a contributor is recommended to core by a committer. For contributors or outsiders to contact core asking to be a committer is not well thought of and is usually rejected. If the area of particular interest for the developer potentially overlaps with other committers' area of maintainership, the opinion of those maintainers is sought. However, it is frequently this committer that recommends the developer. When a contributor is given committer status, he is assigned a mentor. The committer who recommended the new committer will, in the general case, take it upon himself to be the new committers mentor. When a contributor is given his commit bit, a PGP-signed email is sent from either Core Secretary, Ports Manager or nik@freebsd.org to both admins@freebsd.org, the assigned mentor, the new committer and core confirming the approval of a new account. The mentor then gathers a password line, SSH 2 public key and PGP key from the new committer and sends them to Admin. When the new account is created, the mentor activates the commit bit and guides the new committer through the rest of the initial process. Figure 6-1. Process summary: adding a new committer When a contributor sends a piece of code, the receiving committer may choose to recommend that the contributor is given commit privileges. If he recommends this to core, they will vote on this recommendation. If they vote in favour, a mentor is assigned the new committer and the new committer has to email his details to the administrators for an account to be created. After this, the new committer is all set to make his first commit. By tradition, this is by adding his name to the committers list. Recall that a committer is considered to be someone who has committed code during the past 12 months. However, it is not until after 18 months of inactivity have passed that commit privileges are eligible to be revoked. [FreeBSD, 2002H] There are, however, no automatic procedures for doing this. For reactions concerning commit privileges not triggered by time, see section 1.5.8. Figure 6-2. Process summary: removing a committer When Core decides to clean up the committers list, they check who has not made a commit for the past 18 months. Committers who have not done so have their commit bits revoked. It is also possible for committers to request that their commit bit be retired if for some reason they are no longer going to be actively committing to the project. In this case, it can also be restored at a later time by core, should the committer ask. Roles in this process: Core team Contributor Committer Maintainership Mentor [FreeBSD, 2000A] [FreeBSD, 2002H] [FreeBSD, 2002I] 6.2. Adding/Removing an official CVSup Mirror A CVSup mirror is a replica of the official CVSup master that contains all the up-to-date source code for all the branches in the FreeBSD project, ports and documentation. Adding an official CVSup mirror starts with the potential CVSup Mirror Site Admin installing the “cvsup-mirror” package. Having done this and updated the source code with a mirror site, he now runs a fairly recent unofficial CVSup mirror. Deciding he has a stable environment, the processing power, the network capacity and the storage capacity to run an official mirror, he mails the CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator who decides whether the mirror should become an official mirror or not. In making this decision, the CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator has to determine whether that geographical area needs another mirror site, if the mirror administrator has the skills to run it reliably, if the network bandwidth is adequate and if the master server has the capacity to server another mirror. If CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator decides that the mirror should become an official mirror, he obtains an authentication key from the mirror admin that he installs so the mirror admin can update the mirror from the master server. Figure 6-3. Process summary: adding a CVSup mirror When a CVSup mirror administrator of an unofficial mirror offers to become an official mirror site, the CVSup coordinator decides if another mirror is needed and if there is sufficient capacity to accommodate it. If so, an authorisation key is requested and the mirror is given access to the main distribution site and added to the list of official mirrors. Tools used in this process: CVSup SSH 2 Hats involved in this process: CVSup Mirror Site Coordinator CVSup Mirror Site Admin 6.3. Committing code The committing of new or modified code is one of the most frequent processes in the FreeBSD project and will usually happen many times a day. Committing of code can only be done by a “committer”. Committers commit either code written by themselves, code submitted to them or code submitted through a problem report. When code is written by the developer that is non-trivial, he should seek a code review from the community. This is done by sending mail to the relevant list asking for review. Before submitting the code for review, he should ensure it compiles correctly with the entire tree and that all relevant tests run. This is called “pre-commit test”. When contributed code is received, it should be reviewed by the committer and tested the same way. When a change is committed to a part of the source that has been contributed from an outside Vendor, the maintainer should ensure that the patch is contributed back to the vendor. This is in line with the open source philosophy and makes it easier to stay in sync with outside projects as the patches do not have to be reapplied every time a new release is made. After the code has been available for review and no further changes are necessary, the code is committed into the development branch, -CURRENT. If the change applies for the -STABLE branch or the other branches as well, a “Merge From Current” ("MFC") countdown is set by the committer. After the number of days the committer chose when setting the MFC have passed, an email will automatically be sent to the committer reminding him to commit it to the -STABLE branch (and possibly security branches as well). Only security critical changes should be merged to security branches. Delaying the commit to -STABLE and other branches allows for “parallel debugging” where the committed code is tested on a wide range of configurations. This makes changes to -STABLE to contain fewer faults and thus giving the branch its name. Figure 6-4. Process summary: A committer commits code When a committer has written a piece of code and wants to commit it, he first needs to determine if it is trivial enough to go in without prior review or if it should first be reviewed by the developer community. If the code is trivial or has been reviewed and the committer is not the maintainer, he should consult the maintainer before proceeding. If the code is contributed by an outside vendor, the maintainer should create a patch that is sent back to the vendor. The code is then committed and the deployed by the users. Should they find problems with the code, this will be reported and the committer can go back to writing a patch. If a vendor is affected, he can choose to implement or ignore the patch. Figure 6-5. Process summary: A contributor commits code The difference when a contributor makes a code contribution is that he submits the code through the send-pr program. This report is picked up by the maintainer who reviews the code and commits it. Hats included in this process are: Committer Contributor Vendor Reviewer [FreeBSD, 2001] [Jørgensen, 2001] 6.4. Core election Core elections are held at least every two years. [8] Nine core members are elected. New elections are held if the number of core members drops below seven. New elections can also be held should at least 1/3 of the active committers demand this. When an election is to take place, core announces this at least 6 weeks in advance, and appoints an election manager to run the elections. Only committers can be elected into core. The candidates need to submit their candidacy at least one week before the election starts, but can refine their statements until the voting starts. They are presented in the candidates list. When writing their election statements, the candidates must answer a few standard questions submitted by the election manager. During elections, the rule that a committer must have committed during the 12 past months is followed strictly. Only these committers are eligible to vote. When voting, the committer may vote once in support of up to nine nominees. The voting is done over a period of four weeks with reminders being posted on “developers” mailing list that is available to all committers. The election results are released one week after the election ends, and the new core team takes office one week after the results have been posted. Should there be a voting tie, this will be resolved by the new, unambiguously elected core members. Votes and candidate statements are archived, but the archives are not publicly available. Figure 6-6. Process summary: Core elections Core announces the election and selects an election manager. He prepares the elections, and when ready, candidates can announce their candidacies through submitting their statements. The committers then vote. After the vote is over, the election results are announced and the new core team takes office. Hats in core elections are: Core team Committer Election Manager [FreeBSD, 2000A] [FreeBSD, 2002B] [FreeBSD, 2002G] 6.5. Development of new features Within the project there are sub-projects that are working on new features. These projects are generally done by one person [Jørgensen, 2001]. Every project is free to organise development as it sees fit. However, when the project is merged to the -CURRENT branch it must follow the project guidelines. When the code has been well tested in the -CURRENT branch and deemed stable enough and relevant to the -STABLE branch, it is merged to the -STABLE branch. The requirements of the project are given by developer wishes, requests from the community in terms of direct requests by mail, Problem Reports, commercial funding for the development of features, or contributions by the scientific community. The wishes that come within the responsibility of a developer are given to that developer who prioritises his time between the request and his wishes. A common way to do this is maintain a TODO-list maintained by the project. Items that do not come within someone's responsibility are collected on TODO-lists unless someone volunteers to take the responsibility. All requests, their distribution and follow-up are handled by the GNATS tool. Requirements analysis happens in two ways. The requests that come in are discussed on mailing lists, both within the main project and in the sub-project that the request belongs to or is spawned by the request. Furthermore, individual developers on the sub-project will evaluate the feasibility of the requests and determine the prioritisation between them. Other than archives of the discussions that have taken place, no outcome is created by this phase that is merged into the main project. As the requests are prioritised by the individual developers on the basis of doing what they find interesting, necessary or are funded to do, there is no overall strategy or priorisation of what requests to regard as requirements and following up their correct implementation. However, most developers have some shared vision of what issues are more important, and they can ask for guidelines from the release engineering team. The verification phase of the project is two-fold. Before committing code to the current-branch, developers request their code to be reviewed by their peers. This review is for the most part done by functional testing, but also code review is important. When the code is committed to the branch, a broader functional testing will happen, that may trigger further code review and debugging should the code not behave as expected. This second verification form may be regarded as structural verification. Although the sub-projects themselves may write formal tests such as unit tests, these are usually not collected by the main project and are usually removed before the code is committed to the current branch. [9] 6.6. Maintenance It is an advantage to the project to for each area of the source have at least one person that knows this area well. Some parts of the code have designated maintainers. Others have de-facto maintainers, and some parts of the system do not have maintainers. The maintainer is usually a person from the sub-project that wrote and integrated the code, or someone who has ported it from the platform it was written for. [10] The maintainer's job is to make sure the code is in sync with the project the code comes from if it is contributed code, and apply patches submitted by the community or write fixes to issues that are discovered. The main bulk of work that is put into the FreeBSD project is maintenance. [Jørgensen, 2001] has made a figure showing the life cycle of changes. Figure 6-7. Jørgenssen's model for change integration Here “development release” refers to the -CURRENT branch while “production release” refers to the -STABLE branch. The “pre-commit test” is the functional testing by peer developers when asked to do so or trying out the code to determine the status of the sub-project. “Parallel debugging” is the functional testing that can trigger more review, and debugging when the code is included in the -CURRENT branch. As of this writing, there were 269 committers in the project. When they commit a change to a branch, that constitutes a new release. It is very common for users in the community to track a particular branch. The immediate existence of a new release makes the changes widely available right away and allows for rapid feedback from the community. This also gives the community the response time they expect on issues that are of importance to them. This makes the community more engaged, and thus allows for more and better feedback that again spurs more maintenance and ultimately should create a better product. Before making changes to code in parts of the tree that has a history unknown to the committer, the committer is required to read the commit logs to see why certain features are implemented the way they are in order not to make mistakes that have previously either been thought through or resolved. 6.7. Problem reporting FreeBSD comes with a problem reporting tool called “send-pr” that is a part of the GNATS package. All users and developers are encouraged to use this tool for reporting problems in software they do not maintain. Problems include bug reports, feature requests, features that should be enhanced and notices of new versions of external software that is included in the project. Problem reports are sent to an email address where it is inserted into the GNATS maintenance database. A Bugbuster classifies the problem and sends it to the correct group or maintainer within the project. After someone has taken responsibility for the report, the report is being analysed. This analysis includes verifying the problem and thinking out a solution for the problem. Often feedback is required from the report originator or even from the FreeBSD community. Once a patch for the problem is made, the originator may be asked to try it out. Finally, the working patch is integrated into the project, and documented if applicable. It there goes through the regular maintenance cycle as described in section maintenance. These are the states a problem report can be in: open, analyzed, feedback, patched, suspended and closed. The suspended state is for when further progress is not possible due to the lack of information or for when the task would require so much work that nobody is working on it at the moment. Figure 6-8. Process summary: problem reporting A problem is reported by the report originator. It is then classified by a bugbuster and handed to the correct maintainer. He verifies the problem and discusses the problem with the originator until he has enough information to create a working patch. This patch is then committed and the problem report is closed. The roles included in this process are: Report originator Maintainership Bugbuster [FreeBSD, 2002C]. [FreeBSD, 2002D] 6.8. Reacting to misbehaviour [FreeBSD, 2001] has a number of rules that committers should follow. However, it happens that these rules are broken. The following rules exist in order to be able to react to misbehaviour. They specify what actions will result in how long a suspension the committer's commit privileges. Committing during code freezes without the approval of the Release Engineering team - 2 days Committing to a security branch without approval - 2 days Commit wars - 5 days to all participating parties Impolite or inappropriate behaviour - 5 days [Lehey, 2002] For the suspensions to be efficient, any single core member can implement a suspension before discussing it on the “core” mailing list. Repeat offenders can, with a 2/3 vote by core, receive harsher penalties, including permanent removal of commit privileges. (However, the latter is always viewed as a last resort, due to its inherent tendency to create controversy). All suspensions are posted to the “developers” mailing list, a list available to committers only. It is important that you cannot be suspended for making technical errors. All penalties come from breaking social etiquette. Hats involved in this process: Core team Committer 6.9. Release engineering The FreeBSD project has a Release Engineering team with a principal release engineer that is responsible for creating releases of FreeBSD that can be brought out to the user community via the net or sold in retail outlets. Since FreeBSD is available on multiple platforms and releases for the different architectures are made available at the same time, the team has one person in charge of each architecture. Also, there are roles in the team responsible for coordinating quality assurance efforts, building a package set and for having an updated set of documents. When referring to the release engineer, a representative for the release engineering team is meant. When a release is coming, the FreeBSD project changes shape somewhat. A release schedule is made containing feature- and code-freezes, release of interim releases and the final release. A feature-freeze means no new features are allowed to be committed to the branch without the release engineers' explicit consent. Code-freeze means no changes to the code (like bugs-fixes) are allowed to be committed without the release engineers explicit consent. This feature- and code-freeze is known as stabilising. During the release process, the release engineer has the full authority to revert to older versions of code and thus "back out" changes should he find that the changes are not suitable to be included in the release. There are three different kinds of releases: .0 releases are the first release of a major version. These are branched of the -CURRENT branch and have a significantly longer release engineering cycle due to the unstable nature of the -CURRENT branch .X releases are releases of the -STABLE branch. They are scheduled to come out every 4 months. .X.Y releases are security releases that follow the .X branch. These come out only when sufficient security fixes have been merged since the last release on that branch. New features are rarely included, and the security team is far more involved in these than in regular releases. For releases of the -STABLE-branch, the release process starts 45 days before the anticipated release date. During the first phase, the first 15 days, the developers merge what changes they have had in -CURRENT that they want to have in the release to the release branch. When this period is over, the code enters a 15 day code freeze in which only bug fixes, documentation updates, security-related fixes and minor device driver changes are allowed. These changes must be approved by the release engineer in advance. At the beginning of the last 15 day period a release candidate is created for widespread testing. Updates are less likely to be allowed during this period, except for important bug fixes and security updates. In this final period, all releases are considered release candidates. At the end of the release process, a release is created with the new version number, including binary distributions on web sites and the creation of a CD-ROM images. However, the release is not considered "really released" until a PGP-signed message stating exactly that, is sent to the mailing list freebsd-announce; anything labelled as a "release" before that may well be in-process and subject to change before the PGP-signed message is sent. [11]. The releases of the -CURRENT-branch (that is, all releases that end with “.0”) are very similar, but with twice as long timeframe. It starts 8 weeks prior to the release with announcement of the release time line. Two weeks into the release process, the feature freeze is initiated and performance tweaks should be kept to a minimum. Four weeks prior to the release, an official beta version is made available. Two weeks prior to release, the code is officially branched into a new version. This version is given release candidate status, and as with the release engineering of -STABLE, the code freeze of the release candidate is hardened. However, development on the main development branch can continue. Other than these differences, the release engineering processes are alike. .0 releases go into their own branch and are aimed mainly at early adopters. The branch then goes through a period of stabilisation, and it is not until the Release Engineering Team> decides the demands to stability have been satisfied that the branch becomes -STABLE and -CURRENT targets the next major version. While this for the majority has been with .1 versions, this is not a demand. Most releases are made when a given date that has been deemed a long enough time since the previous release comes. A target is set for having major releases every 18 months and minor releases every 4 months. The user community has made it very clear that security and stability cannot be sacrificed by self-imposed deadlines and target release dates. For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security and stability issues, extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE. Figure 6-9. Process summary: release engineering These are the stages in the release engineering process. Multiple release candidates may be created until the release is deemed stable enough to be released. [FreeBSD, 2002E] Chapter 7 Tools The major support tools for supporting the development process are CVS, CVSup, Perforce, GNATS, Mailman and OpenSSH. Except for CVSup, these are externally developed tools. These tools are commonly used in the open source world. 7.1. Concurrent Versions System (CVS) Concurrent Versions System or simply “CVS” is a system to handle multiple versions of text files and tracking who committed what changes and why. A project lives within a “repository” and different versions are considered different “branches”. 7.2. CVSup CVSup is a software package for distributing and updating collections of files across a network. It consists of a client program, cvsup, and a server program, cvsupd. The package is tailored specifically for distributing CVS repositories, and by taking advantage of CVS' properties, it performs updates much faster than traditional systems. 7.3. GNATS GNATS is a maintenance database consisting of a set of tools to track bugs at a central site. It supports the bug tracking process for sending and handling bugs as well as querying and updating the database and editing bug reports. The project uses one of its many client interfaces, “send-pr”, to send “Problem Reports” by email to the projects central GNATS server. The committers have also web and command-line clients available. 7.4. Mailman Mailman is a program that automates the management of mailing lists. The FreeBSD Project uses it to run 16 general lists, 60 technical lists, 4 limited lists and 5 lists with CVS commit logs. It is also used for many mailing lists set up and used by other people and projects in the FreeBSD community. General lists are lists for the general public, technical lists are mainly for the development of specific areas of interest, and closed lists are for internal communication not intended for the general public. The majority of all the communication in the project goes through these 85 lists [FreeBSD, 2003A, Appendix C]. 7.5. Perforce Perforce is a commercial software configuration management system developed by Perforce Systems that is available on over 50 operating systems. It is a collection of clients built around the Perforce server that contains the central file repository and tracks the operations done upon it. The clients are both clients for accessing the repository and administration of its configuration. 7.6. Pretty Good Privacy Pretty Good Privacy, better known as PGP, is a cryptosystem using a public key architecture to allow people to digitally sign and/or encrypt information in order to ensure secure communication between two parties. A signature is used when sending information out many recipients, enabling them to verify that the information has not been tampered with before they received it. In the FreeBSD Project this is the primary means of ensuring that information has been written by the person who claims to have written it, and not altered in transit. 7.7. Secure Shell Secure Shell is a standard for securely logging into a remote system and for executing commands on the remote system. It allows other connections, called tunnels, to be established and protected between the two involved systems. This standard exists in two primary versions, and only version two is used for the FreeBSD Project. The most common implementation of the standard is OpenSSH that is a part of the project's main distribution. Since its source is updated more often than FreeBSD releases, the latest version is also available in the ports tree. Chapter 8 Sub-projects Sub-projects are formed to reduce the amount of communication needed to coordinate the group of developers. When a problem area is sufficiently isolated, most communication would be within the group focusing on the problem, requiring less communication with the groups they communicate with than were the group not isolated. 8.1. The Ports Subproject A “port” is a set of meta-data and patches that are needed to fetch, compile and install correctly an external piece of software on a FreeBSD system. The amount of ports have grown at a tremendous rate, as shown by the following figure. Figure 8-1. Number of ports added between 1996 and 2005 Figure 8-1 is taken from the FreeBSD web site. It shows the number of ports available to FreeBSD in the period 1995 to 2005. It looks like the curve has first grown exponentionally, and then since the middle of 2001 grown linerly. As the external software described by the port often is under continued development, the amount of work required to maintain the ports is already large, and increasing. This has led to the ports part of the FreeBSD project gaining a more empowered structure, and is more and more becoming a sub-project of the FreeBSD project. Ports has its own core team with the Ports Manager as its leader, and this team can appoint committers without FreeBSD Core's approval. Unlike in the FreeBSD Project, where a lot of maintenance frequently is rewarded with a commit bit, the ports sub-project contains many active maintainers that are not committers. Unlike the main project, the ports tree is not branched. Every release of FreeBSD follows the current ports collection and has thus available updated information on where to find programs and how to build them. This, however, means that a port that makes dependencies on the system may need to have variations depending on what version of FreeBSD it runs on. With an unbranched ports repository it is not possible to guarantee that any port will run on anything other than -CURRENT and -STABLE, in particular older, minor releases. There is neither the infrastructure nor volunteer time needed to guarantee this. For efficiency of communication, teams depending on Ports, such as the release engineering team, have their own ports liaisons. 8.2. The FreeBSD Documentation Project The FreeBSD Documentation project was started January 1995. From the initial group of a project leader, four team leaders and 16 members, they are now a total of 44 committers. The documentation mailing list has just under 300 members, indicating that there is quite a large community around it. The goal of the Documentation project is to provide good and useful documentation of the FreeBSD project, thus making it easier for new users to get familiar with the system and detailing advanced features for the users. The main tasks in the Documentation project are to work on current projects in the “FreeBSD Documentation Set”, and translate the documentation to other languages. Like the FreeBSD Project, documentation is split in the same branches. This is done so that there is always an updated version of the documentation for each version. Only documentation errors are corrected in the security branches. Like the ports sub-project, the Documentation project can appoint documentation committers without FreeBSD Core's approval. [FreeBSD, 2003B]. The Documentation project has a primer. This is used both to introduce new project members to the standard tools and syntaxes and acts as a reference when working on the project. References [Brooks, 1995] Frederick P. Brooks, 1975, 1995, 0201835959, Addison-Wesley Pub Co, The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Anniversary Edition (2nd Edition). [Saers, 2003] Niklas Saers, 2003, A project model for the FreeBSD Project: Candidatus Scientiarum thesis. [Jørgensen, 2001] Niels Jørgensen, 2001, Putting it All in the Trunk: Incremental Software Development in the FreeBSD Open Source Project. [PMI, 2000] Project Management Institute, 1996, 2000, 1-880410-23-0, Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, PMBOK Guide: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2000 Edition. [FreeBSD, 2000A] 2002, Core Bylaws. [FreeBSD, 2002A] 2002, FreeBSD Developer's Handbook. [FreeBSD, 2002B] 2002, Core team election 2002. [Losh, 2002] Warner Losh, 2002, Working with Hats. [FreeBSD, 2002C] Dag-Erling Smørgrav and Hiten Pandya, 2002, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, Problem Report Handling Guidelines. [FreeBSD, 2002D] Dag-Erling Smørgrav, 2002, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, Writing FreeBSD Problem Reports. [FreeBSD, 2001] 2001, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, Committers Guide. [FreeBSD, 2002E] Murray Stokely, 2002, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, FreeBSD Release Engineering. [FreeBSD, 2003A] The FreeBSD Documentation Project, FreeBSD Handbook. [FreeBSD, 2002F] 2002, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, Contributors to FreeBSD. [FreeBSD, 2002G] 2002, The FreeBSD Project, Core team elections 2002. [FreeBSD, 2002H] 2002, The FreeBSD Project, Commit Bit Expiration Policy: 2002/04/06 15:35:30. [FreeBSD, 2002I] 2002, The FreeBSD Project, New Account Creation Procedure: 2002/08/19 17:11:27. [FreeBSD, 2003B] 2002, The FreeBSD Documentation Project, FreeBSD DocEng Team Charter: 2003/03/16 12:17. [Lehey, 2002] Greg Lehey, 2002, Greg Lehey, Two years in the trenches: The evolution of a software project. Notes [1] This goes hand-in-hand with Brooks' law that “adding another person to a late project will make it later” since it will increase the communication needs Brooks, 1995. A project model is a tool to reduce the communication needs. [2] Statistics are generated by counting the number of entries in the file fetched by portsdb by April 1st, 2005. portsdb is a part of the port sysutils/portupgrade. [3] The period from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2004 was examined to find this number. [4] For instance, the development of the Bluetooth stack started as a sub-project until it was deemed stable enough to be merged into the -CURRENT branch. Now it is a part of the core FreeBSD system. [5] According to Kirk McKusick, after 20 years of developing UNIX operating systems, the interfaces are for the most part figured out. There is therefore no need for much design. However, new applications of the system and new hardware leads to some implementations being more beneficial than those that used to be preferred. One example is the introduction of web browsing that made the normal TCP/IP connection a short burst of data rather than a steady stream over a longer period of time. [6] The first release this actually happened for was 4.5-RELEASE, but security branches were at the same time created for 4.3-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE. [7] There is a terminology overlap with respect to the word "stable", which leads to some confusion. The -STABLE branch is still a development branch, whose goal is to be useful for most people. If it is never acceptable for a system to get changes that are not announced at the time it is deployed, that system should run a security branch. [8] The first Core election was held September 2000 [9] More and more tests are however performed when building the system &
RELEASE NOTES FOR MICROSOFT(R) TCP/IP-32 FOR WINDOWS(TM) FOR WORKGROUPS 3.11 PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT General ------- This product is compatible with, and supported exclusively on, the Microsoft Windows For Workgroups 3.11 platform. If you are running a different TCP/IP product on your system, you must remove it before installing Microsoft TCP/IP-32. If you experience difficulties with another vendor's product, remove the existing TCP/IP stack, exit Network Setup completely, reboot your system, and then proceed to add the Microsoft TCP/IP-32 drivers by following the instructions given in the documentation. Known Problems -------------- There have been a number of reports on IBM TokenRing, EtherLink III cards, and ODI drivers that are related to bugs in drivers other than TCP/IP-32. These Windows For Workgroups 3.11 patches are described in the following Application Notes: WG0990 (contains updated ELNK3.386) WG0988 (contains updated IBMTOK.386) WG1004 (contains updated MSODISUP.386) You can obtain these Application Notes from the following sources: - The Internet (ftp.microsoft.com) - CompuServe(R), GEnie(TM), and Microsoft OnLine - Microsoft Download Service (MSDL) - Microsoft Product Support Services On CompuServe, GEnie, and Microsoft OnLine, Application Notes are located in the Microsoft Software Library. You can find an Application Note in the Software Library by searching on a keyword, for example "WG0990". Application Notes are available by modem from the Microsoft Download Service (MSDL), which you can reach by calling (206) 936-6735. This service is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The highest download speed available is 14,400 bits per second (bps). For more information about using the MSDL, call (800) 936-4200 and follow the prompts. Previous Beta Users ------------------- If you had installed a previous beta of the Microsoft TCP/IP-32 for Windows for Workgroups product, you may encounter one of the following errors: "Setup Error 108: Could not create or open the protocol.ini file." "Setup Error 110: Could not find or open win.ini." If this happens do the following: 1) Remove any previous versions of Microsoft TCP/IP-32. 2) Exit Network Setup and restart your system. 3) Rename any OEMx.INF (where x is any number) files that are in your WINDOWS\SYSTEM directory. 4) Go back into Network Setup and install Microsoft TCP/IP-32 following the installation instructions in the manual. Mosaic ------ NCSA's Win32s version of their popular Mosaic application requires that you pick up version 115a or greater of the Win32s distribution to function correctly. DHCP Automatic Configuration ---------------------------- DHCP is a new TCP/IP protocol that provides the ability to acquire TCP/IP addressing and configuration dynamically with no user intervention. DHCP depends on your network administrator to set up a DHCP server on your network. A DHCP server is scheduled to ship as part of Windows NT(TM) Server version 3.5. If you enable automatic DHCP configuration without a DHCP server available on your network, the following message will appear after approximately a 10 second black-screen delay during the Windows for Workgroups booting process: "The DHCP client was unable to obtain an IP network address from a DHCP server. Do you want to see future DHCP messages?" This message means that TCP/IP has initialized but without any addressing information. If you are running TCP/IP as your only protocol, you will not have access to the network. This situation requires that you go back to the TCP/IP configuration settings, disable DHCP, and manually specify your TCP/IP network parameters. If you are running multiple protocols, you should have access to your network with these. If you do have a DHCP server on your network and this message appears, this indicates that the server was unavailable and that your lease has expired. DHCP will (in the background) continue to try to acquire a valid lease while Windows for Workgroups continues to run (although you will not have TCP/IP functionality). If you are running with DHCP automatic configuration, use the IPCONFIG utility to learn your IP configuration. DHCP Options ------------ The following changes are not reflected in the TCP/IP-32 documentation. Currently Microsoft DHCP clients support only the following options: - DHCP protocol options - DHCP message type (53) - Lease Time (51), Renewal Time (58), Rebind Time (59) - Information options: - Subnet Mask (1) - Default Router (3) - DNS Server (6) - WINS Server (NetBIOS Name Server) (44) - NetBIOS Node Type (46) - NetBIOS Scope Id (47) Any other options received by the client are ignored and discarded. No Option Overlays - Option Limit Is 336 Bytes ---------------------------------------------- The DHCP client does not recognize option overlays. If a non-Microsoft server is sending the options, make sure that either all the options fit within the standard option field, or at least that those used by the Microsoft clients (listed above) are conta ined in the standard Option field. Since the Microsoft client only supports a subset of the defined DHCP option types, 336 bytes should be sufficient for any configuration. Ipconfig - Moving Client to New Address --------------------------------------- When a DHCP client is moved to a new reserved address or is moved from an address to make way for an exclusion or another client's reservation, the client should first release its current address using ipconfig /release. This may be followed by ipconfig /renew to get a new address. ARP Conflicts - Report to DHCP Server Administrator --------------------------------------------------- Before the TCP/IP stack comes up with the address acquired via DHCP, the stack ARPs for the address. If a machine is already running with this address, the client will display a popup informing the user of the address conflict. Users should contact the CP server administrator when this occurs. Once the server has excluded the conflicting address, the client should get a new address using ipconfig /renew. If this is unsuccessful, the client may need to reboot. NetBIOS over TCP/IP ------------------- Multihomed Computer NetBIOS Node Type A computer can be one of four NetBIOS node types: broadcast node, mixed node, point-to-point node, or hybrid node. The node type cannot be specified per network adapter card. In some circumstances, it may be desirable to have one or more network adapter c ards function as broadcast nodes and other network adapter cards to function as hybrids. You accomplish this by setting the node type to broadcast node, and configuring WINS name server addresses for the network adapter cards that will function as hybrids. The presence of the WINS addresses will effectively override the broadcast node setting for the adapters on which they are set. To make an adapter a broadcast node, configure DHCP to set the node type to Bnode, or in the absence of DHCP, the computer will assume Bnode behavior by default. Including Remote LMHOSTS Files You must modify the Registry of a remote computer if network clients will #INCLUDE the LMHOSTS file on the remote Windows NT computer. The share containing the LMHOSTS file must be in the Null Sessions list on the Server by adding the share name to the following Windows NT Registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services \LanManServer\Parameters\NullSessionShares Microsoft TCP/IP Workstations with UB NetBIOS Name Servers ---------------------------------------------------------- The Microsoft clients can be configured to use a UB name server by adding the SYSTEM.INI parameter RefreshOpCode under the [NBT] section. Set its value to 9 to interoperate with UB name servers. NetDDE Applications Communicating over Subnets via LMHOSTS ---------------------------------------------------------- If you are connecting to a remote machine via a NetDDE application, using a #PRE LMHOSTS entry, you must have a separate entry specifying a special character in the 16th byte: 138.121.43.100 REMOTEDDE #PRE 138.121.43.100 "REMOTEDDE \0x1F" A special entry is not required if #PRE is not used. Browsing Resources on Remote IP Subnetworks ------------------------------------------- Browsing remote IP subnetworks requires a Windows NT computer on the local subnet. Using File Manager to Access Servers Specified in LMHOSTS --------------------------------------------------------- Reading and parsing LMHOSTS to resolve a name is done by the NBT driver at run time. This operation is not permissible under certain conditions. One such condition commonly encountered is when a network connection is attempted from the File Manager. The result is that the name is reported as 'not resolved' even if the name exists in LMHOSTS file (since the driver wasn't even allowed to open LMHOSTS file). The workaround for such conditions is to put a #PRE against the name in the LMHOSTS file. This causes the name to be stored in the name cache when the machine is first initialized, so the name gets resolved without the driver having to open LMHOSTS at run time. IP Routing ---------- Multiple Default Gateways in Microsoft TCP/IP Act as Backup Gateways When more than one default gateway is specified for a given IP network or for multiple IP networks on different network cards, the first default gateway for the first network card is always used to route IP network traffic. All the subsequent gateways are used as backup when the first default gateway is discovered to be unavailable. The Dead Gateway Detection mechanism is used only with TCP (connection-oriented traffic). Therefore, utilities like PING will only use the first default gateway. Notice that t his only applies to IP datagrams that have to be routed to a remote network (that is, to a network to which the workstation is not directly connected). FTP --- FTP is implemented in a Windows console in this release. It is not presently hooked to the Microsoft TCP/IP-32 Help file, although the Help file does have FTP command summaries in it. Many of the documented command line options are supported, although they require you to modify your FTP Program Item manually. The FTP application which ships with this product does not support the "!" command, which typically invokes a user shell. ODI Driver Support ------------------ Due to system restrictions, TCP/IP-32 cannot support more than one network adapter using ODI drivers. Multihomed configurations are supported using NDIS drivers only. If after installing TCP/IP-32 you have problems accessing the network over your ODI drivers, please make sure that the syntax and frame types listed in your NET.CFG file are correct for your network. DNS Resolution Hierarchy ------------------------ The Microsoft TCP/IP-32 stack uses various means to resolve a host name to get the IP address of a certain host. The various mechanisms used are Local Cached Information, Hosts File, DNS Servers, and NetBIOS name resolution mechanisms. The default resolution order for resolving a host name is Local Cached Information -> Hosts File -> DNS Servers -> NetBt (NetBIOS over TCP/IP). NetBIOS over TCP/IP name resolution can consist of local subnet broadcasts, and/or querying the Windows Internet Names Server (WINS) running on Windows NT Servers. Your Guide to Service and Support for Microsoft TCP/IP-32 --------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Support: Network Advanced Systems Products Support Options The following support services are available from Microsoft for Microsoft Advanced Systems products, including Microsoft Mail Server and its gateways, SQL Server, LAN Manager, Windows NT Workstation, Windows NT Server, and SNA Server. Electronic Services ------------------- Microsoft Forums ---------------- These forums are provided through the CompuServe Information Service, (800) 848-8199, representative 230 (sales information only). Access is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays. These forums enable an interactive technical dialog between users as well as remote access to the Microsoft KnowledgeBase of product information, which is updated daily. These forums are monitored by Microsoft support engineers for technical accuracy. If you are already a subscriber, type "GO " at any ! prompt. MSCLIENT Microsoft Network Client support WINNT Microsoft Windows NT support MSSQL Microsoft SQL Server support MSWRKGRP Microsoft Windows for Workgroups support MSNETWORKS Microsoft LAN Manager support MSAPP Microsoft applications support MSWIN32 Information on Win32 MSDR Development-related discussion forum WINEXT Support for extensions and drivers for Windows WINSDK Support for Microsoft Windows Software Development Kit Microsoft Download Service -------------------------- Use the Microsoft Download Service (MSDL) to access the latest technical notes on common advanced system products support issues via modem. MSDL is at (206) 936-6735, available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays (1200, 2400, or 9600 baud; no parity, 8 data bits, 1 stop bit). Internet -------- Use the Internet to access the Microsoft Driver Library and Microsoft KnowledgeBase. The Microsoft Internet FTP archive host FTP.MICROSOFT.COM (ip address 198.105.232.1) supports anonymous login. When logging in as anonymous, please offer your complete e-mail name as your password. Telephone Support ----------------- Microsoft FastTips ------------------ An interactive, automated system providing support at no charge through toll lines and accessed by touch-tone phone. FastTips provides fast access to answers to common questions and a library of technical notes delivered by phone recording or fax. FastTips is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays. Microsoft Advanced Systems products (800) 936-4400 Priority Telephone Support -------------------------- Get technical support from a Microsoft engineer. Microsoft offers pay-as-you-go telephone support from a Microsoft engineer, available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except holidays. Choose from the following options: Per Incident: Dial (900) 555-2100. $150.00 per incident. (Charges appear on your telephone bill.) Per Incident: Dial (800) 936-5900. $150.00 per incident. (Charges billed to your Visa, Master Card, or American Express.) 10-pack: Ten incidents for $995 prepaid. Additional Information ---------------------- For additional information about Microsoft support options or for a list of Microsoft Solution Providers, call Microsoft Support Network Sales and Information Group at (800) 936-3500, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Pacific time, excluding holidays. This list includes only domestic support programs. Microsoft's customer support services are subject to Microsoft's then-current price, terms, and conditions.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= ~ Import REConstructor v1.7c FINAL by MackT/uCF2000 in 2001-2008 ~ = = ~ - *for Windows 9x, ME, NT, 2K, XP, Vista32/64* - ~ =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= If you would like to help continue developing and bug fixing ImpREC and you have ideas, suggestions or bug fixes please visit Tuts 4 You forum in the following topic to share your ideas: http://www.tuts4you.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=6410 Thank you! v1.7c FINAL (PUBLIC VERSION) ---------------------------- - Misc - Fixed bug introduced in 1.7b when DLL's have discardable sections (jstorme) v1.7b FINAL (PUBLIC VERSION) ---------------------------- - Misc - Fixed invalid API bug in user32.dll on Windows 98 (jstorme) - Modified code to improve support for discardable/unreadable sections (jstorme) - Fixed ImageBase problem with DLL's when "Use PE Header from Disk" is checked (jstorme) - Added an "ImpREC Classic" looking version v1.7a FINAL (PUBLIC VERSION) ---------------------------- - Misc - Fixed Win2K crash, AllocConsole was replaced with ActivateActCtx (jstorme) v1.7 FINAL (PUBLIC VERSION) --------------------------- - Misc - Fixed RestoreLastError API set to SetLastError for WinXP/Vista compatibility (MaRKuS_TH-DJM) - user32.dll is always read from the system, prevents a crash from corrupted PE of user32.dll (MaRKuS_TH-DJM) - Latest version of psapi.dll (6.0.6000.16386) included - Fixed Vista64 crash bug (jstorme) - GUI modified and improved (based upon Fly's modification) - Updated/corrected plugins and deleted dups v1.6 FINAL (PUBLIC VERSION) --------------------------- - Misc - Finally fixed the bug in the check for adding section (Thanks to Christoph) v1.6 beta *PRIVATE* ------------------- - Tracers - Tracer Level3 - Added EIP Log - Misc - Finally, support relative calls rebuild (not with the loader yet) - Added a disassembler window for redirected code - Added colour to all known imports (Thanks to Jeff Schering) - Added a hex viewer (built with the disassembler) - Fixed blink in RichEdit control - Checkbox "OpCodes" is enable/disable depending on "Hex View" (Thanks to Muffin) - Removed the useless '/' when there's no name (ordinal only) - Disassembler is allowed on valid slot too now - Fixed HexView to show all printable chars - Added disasm comment for where - Added Right Click function on disasm code to ease the life (TRY IT!) - Added 'Get Imports Filter' in 'Advanced Commands' (Greetings to Titi) - Tooltips added in Options - Fixed bug in "Fix dump" renaming (with the char '_' before the ext) - Added Original First Thunks rebuilder (in Options) - Fixed bug on disabled editboxes (you could edit them.... erm) - Added checks in PEFile.cpp for invalid executables (Thanks to Snacker!) - Fixed some possible problems on sscanf and ordinals ("%X" with WORD type) v1.5.1 beta2 *PRIVATE* ---------------------- - Tracers - Error codes updated for the Tracers Level2 and 3 - Misc - Fixed bug from the 1.5.1 beta1 in the Import Editor (a string bug) - Fixed bug on validation check for the 'Congratulations' text (Thanks to LordByte) - Fixed bug in the (Thanks to LordByte) - New imports scheme added (NOT COMPLETE SO DO NOT USE IT) - Support relative calls rebuild => visible with a (R) tag in imports - Fixed a bug with "Create New IAT". It can now manage a thunk which has several apis of different module (Thanks to EOD) - Added 'Load PE Header'. It could be useful to force ImportREC to use your own PE Header (Thanks to EOD) v1.5.1 beta1 *PRIVATE* ---------------------- - Tracers - Tracer Level3 - New approach (Thanks to EliCZ) - Support SEH chain - No more FS instructions emulation - Dumb Mode (YES, it could be useful for redirected scheme which copies the start code of an API and jump later. It has the behaviour of the Tracer Level1 but it really executes the code) - Misc - Added 'Get API Calls' dialogbox to set addresses filter and heuristics - Added 'Mode Cloak' (for anti-imprec tricks) v1.5 *PRIVATE* -------------- - Loader - Clean up code (the injected loader) - Added an IRC log to explain how to use it (Greetings to LaBBa) - Tracers - Error codes updated for the Tracers Level2 and 3 - Plugin Tracer - Redesigned interface for good reasons (See ) - All examples have been updated for the new interface - Support 'Exact Call' feature - GUI switched into a Submenu (ala WorkerBee#2 by ZigD) - Misc - 'AutoTrace' will not use the Tracer Level2 anymore (play CAREFULLY with the TL2 because it's a global hook) - Windows 95 Support (Thanks to EliCZ, Unknown One and ZigD for testing) - Tested under NT4 (Thanks to Unknown One) - The Import Editor (double click on a function) will look for the nearest valid function in the thunk and will get its module name. => Much faster when editing each function by hand. - Improved 'Exact Call' (It will not retrace all exact calls from a slot if they have already been resolved) - New Module Loader (It should be faster) - Support function names which have more than 256 characters. ImportREC left when clicking on (Thanks to ToyBomB and shandi for reports) - added (Right click on the Log listbox) - Fixed Import Editor to look for the name first before looking for the ordinal - Added 'Skip Main Slot' in Options. It will allow you to trace *ONLY* on all Exact Calls. The main slot will be skipped by the tracer. - will stop any tracers (except 'Plugin' if you did not manage it) even when you have selected several slots to trace - ApiHooks Updated (Greetings to EliCZ) - Added an Exact Calls window (right click on the tree) - Added Remove buttons - Sort datas by column when clicking on it (Yop G-RoM! ;p) - will set the IAT RVA and Size in the PE Directories to 0 (Thanks to Crusader) - *ALL* docs have been updated v1.4.2+ ------- - Misc - Fixed wrong image base/size usage when disabling "Use PE Header From Disk" AGAIN! v1.4.2 ------ - Loader - Finally fixed the bug when rebuilding imports of ripped layers (sometimes, it produced an invalid PE file) - Tracers - Tracer Level3 - A little bit faster - Fixed wrong opcodes (Damn copy&paste! Erm)... (Thanks to necrotoad for his target so i could find that bug) => Should work for latest SD2 => The target should not quit anymore under XP - Misc - Added a filter to "Get API Calls" to get valid addresses only - Fixed wrong image base usage when disabling "Use PE Header From Disk" for reloc'ed target for example (Thanks to Thigo) v1.4.1a ------- - Tracers - Tracer Level1 - Fixed a little bug added from the previous version (It could trace into k32.dll... D'oh myself!) v1.4.1 ------ - Loader - Can handle Kernel32 Ordinal - Tracers - Tracer Level1 - It will not be fooled anymore by latest ASProtect Emulated API - Misc - Erratum: "Fix Damaged PDB" is for Win9x/ME only! - "Create New IAT" feature - "Select Code Section(s)" to precise where is the code in the target - Fixed bug when loading imports file which contains Exact Call with ordinal - Debug stub scheme added (for getting API from an executable which was compiled in debug mode) - Full Dump (can dump EXE & DLL and it should work for antidumping tricks) v1.4 ---- - Tracers - Tracer Level1 - Fixed a small bug on the stack emulator (D'oh! Tamus! :p) - Tracer Level3 - Recoded from scratch (Thanks a lot to G-RoM for his precious help and patience) - Plugin - Asprotect v1.2x Emulated API Plugin (Thanks to ZigD) - Misc - Use PE Header informations from dump or disk (in Options) - Debug privilege is now managed and damaged PDB can be repaired (Thanks to EliCZ) - Renormalized exports (for Win9x/ME only) - Fixed a GPF when using the wheel mouse (or arrows keys) just after selecting a process - "Stick" current imports with new added ones correctly (when you do GetImports with several contigous regions) - "Get API Calls" feature - "Exact Call" for Safecast/Safedisc 2 redirections - Load & Save "Exact Call" Imports - Updated to APIHooks 5.6 v1.3 ---- - Import Editor - An editbox for entering the name of the API (MSDN-like when using Index) - Loader - Layers Auto Finder (with recursion) - Layers editor (add/modify/remove) - Improved relocations - Multiple modules can cohabit in a same thunk - Direct calls/jumps to any imports in all layers, are rebuilt (for portability) - Tracers - Tracer Level1 - A little stack emulator was implemented (very basic though) - Plugin Tracer - TRACERS LEVEL 2 AND 3 ARE STILL NOT COMPLETE AND THERE JUST FOR EXPERIMENTATION. THEY ARE LAME so use them if YOU ARE BORED AND NOT AFRAID TO CRASH your computer, YOU ARE WARNED. - Misc - Improved IAT scanner + Bug fixed on the invalid IAT size (negative) found by it - DLL's names are now based on their filename and not on their header structure - New ApiHooks and as usual it still is impressive how it gains speed each time! (Thanks to EliCZ again) - Check on overlapped IAT by new imports (when not adding a new section) v1.2 *Final* ------------ - Fixed a little bug when there is only one invalid pointer and loader is activated, the dialogbox for entering interval of ripped data/code didn't appear. - Fixed a bug in showing new import size when it is empty (0x100 instead of 0) - Added error managing in the loader if it can't find a dll or an api. (So its size has grown up a little bit) - Fixed a bug on wrong section table location when loading PE files (YODAAAAA!!!!!! ;-)) (and for all my PE related code too...) - ApiHooks updated again!! Thanks to EliCZ, it's really faster than before... Wow! ;-) - Autotrace (do not expect a miracle from its part). Moreover prepare to crash if you manage to use it because it uses the tracer level2... you are warned!! :-) - Improved Ripper analyzer v1.2 RC1 PRE Release -------------------- - Added a loader against faked APIs in thunks. - Fixed a little bug when loading a tree for the last parameter if it has only one character - Get the invalid pointers in the running process when reloading a tree which contains some - Added a flag for loader in tree text files (still is compatible with v1.2b3 version though) - ApiHooks updated - You can rebuild DLL now by clicking on "Pick DLL" button - I decided to retire my Tracer L3 for the moment because it's too buggy v1.2b3 ------ - Useless but funny, changed icon... thanks to Avl!s :-) - Function is correctly selected when double clicking on it for Editing. - Oops! Where was the and file on previous versions???! :-) - Don't use anymore GetCurrentDirectory for looking for <remote.dll> - A little note when launching the first time - TimeOut option for Tracer Level2 and 3 - Fix EP to OEP option when fixing a dump - Options are saved in an INI file - Maintaining "Shift" key for Tracer Level1 shows the Module name in the MessageBox title instead of "huhu" :-) and moreover it shows VA correctly now. - Correct ImageSize in PE Header when adding a new section (Windows 98SE and 2k do it automatically but it is better to do it ourselves though) - Added the old good Dennison's uCF logo (i mean the logo, not you Denni! ;-P) in 'About' dialog box - Replace all "between" by "by the way" in all txt files... :-x - Stastistics are shown regularly (thx to Pal) - 'Show Suspect' button (thx to Pal) - Fixed a GPF when closing the running target and continuing to rebuild it (thx to Pal) - Load & Save Tree in text format. (You can still load old binary ".rec" files) (Pal, you can edit them manually now! :-)) - Fixed a bug in my module loader when the module image base is different to its pe header one (ie when it has been moved by windows). (BIG THX TO PAL! ;-)) - Module loading log is more precise now - First prebeta version of tracer l3 (still is VERY BUGGY! You are WARNED!) v1.2b2 ------ - Argh!!!! Export ordinals were fixed now! Sorry, i have forgotten to add the Base for all ordinals!! Marf! That's why my "Import all by ordinal" option didn't work under NT/2000... It's now reactivated under those systems (even if your exe will not be portable to another system) - Fixed a GPF (oops! :-P) when invalidate some particular APIs - Load and Save Tree Models - Enable and Disable controls (buttons and editboxes) when necessary - Tracer level2 is slower (not under Win2000! ;-)) but less buggy than previous version - "Cut thunk" action in right click popup menu. Thanks to my best beta tester Thigo (normal, he's alone ;-P) for reporting me tELock tricks. (Greetz to tE! by the way) ;-) (Read Tips.txt for further details) - Current directory will be the path of your selected process for browsing files - Statistics after clicking on "Get Import" were fixed - Readme.txt was updated. :-) v1.2b1 ------ - Fixed a lame bug on my original IAT finder (a pb on computing its size... thx Chris ;-)) - Multiple Tree Selection - Right Click on Tree (invalidate functions, delete thunk...) - Tracer Level1 (Disasm) was improved (with magic 'Shift" key... look at Tips.txt) - *New* Tracer Level2 (Hook) uses ApiHooks. And big thanks to Yoda for advising me it ;-) - Import module name is auto updated depending on all its functions v1.1 ---- - I have forgotten to considerate the max recursion of the tracer in the options! Now it's fixed. Shame on me, yeah! ;-) - Give up the method to the start address (image base) bounds of the target too (not reliable). Unreal Tournament has shown me that ;-)... BY THE WAY, WHAT A GAME! :-D - Improved tracer again - Improved Original-IAT Auto Finder - GUI : Tree view for import - Default parameter is 'Add new section' DLL v1.0 -------- - DLL was released for GUW32 (by Christoph/UG2000) with its open source code ;-) v1.0 ---- - Give up the method with the limit address of the target (not reliable). Need to reput it in an option - "Auto-IAT Search" button added - "Ultra Arrange" button added - Modify entry point to given OEP into the dump file when fixing it v0.7 ---- - Reorganized code to export it in a dll v0.6a ----- - Show first (or second) invalid element in the 'Imported Function Found' list if it detects a problem in a thunk array - You can change the module of any import functions with the Import Editor - Disable "Import all by ordinal" under NT/2000... It does definitively not work :-( v0.6 ---- - No more leaked memory... I swear! :-) - Support NT/2K by fixing all forwarding export functions (thanks to +The Owl+ AGAIN! ;-)) (Tested on an ASProtected game with total success under win2000 (i mean portable on another system)) - Icedump v6.0.2.2 was released!!! ImportREC will be able to rebuild a 100% portable executable (or very close) with it. (ONLY UNDER WIN9x BY THE WAY) Icedump tries to solve 4 main windows dll which have export functions which point to the same address... => Check it out NOW!!! -> http://icedump.tsx.org v0.5 ---- - Added 2 buttons "Previous ????" and "Next ????" for looking at unresolved pointers quickly - Improved tracer engine... test it and you will see ;-) - Some errors messages are more comprehensible (for Lutin Noir especially ;-D) - GUI has changed a little bit - 'About' diabogbox finally added v0.4 ---- - A memory bug fixed when freeing export infos - "Add new section" in the dump file for the new import datas v0.3a ----- - Bug fixed on hint value which was always set to 0... erm :-) - Import ASCII name address is now aligned on WORD and not DWORD (more smaller size again) - Little filter on all Editboxes - Getting the size of the memory used by the process for memory bounds testing and the tracer v0.3 ---- - First public release - Tested on win2000 and it can not rebuild correctly because of module which contains some API from kernel32.dll of win95/98! :-( (like RltDeleteCriticalSection, ...). If anyone has a solution, please mail me!!!!! - Added a real tracer engine (from Borg disasm of Cronos) but still need to improve its use - Added a function editor (for fixing Asprotect 'GetProcAddress'-like redirected function by yourself for example) ** Double-click on the function in the "Import Functions Found" list and choose the good API. - Bug fixed : you can fix a dump which does not have RVA=RAW addresses and sizes - Import all by ordinal for smaller import datas v0.2 ---- - Not yet tested on NT/2000 - Fixed a lot of bugs - Added a poor tracer for redirected functions Feb/01/2001 ----------- v0.1 - First release

110,561

社区成员

发帖
与我相关
我的任务
社区描述
.NET技术 C#
社区管理员
  • C#
  • Web++
  • by_封爱
加入社区
  • 近7日
  • 近30日
  • 至今
社区公告

让您成为最强悍的C#开发者

试试用AI创作助手写篇文章吧