在tpc 的tpc-w测试中微软的平台全面领先,在前10中全部都是MS的东东,唉,感觉JSP有写鸡肋.

lifejoy 2003-09-26 11:49:53
1 IBM eServer xSeries 440 with xSeries 330 21,139 32.62 US $ 12/31/02 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition Microsoft Windows .NET Enterprise Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 09/12/02
2 PowerEdge 6650 1.6GHz w/PowerEdge 1650 1.4GHz 10,449 27.60 US $ 08/22/02 Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise Edition SP2 Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 08/22/02
3 Dell PowerEdge 6400/900 with PowerApp.Web 120 7,783 24.50 US $ 01/28/02 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Ed. Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 01/28/02
4 IBM e(logo) xSeries 350 with IBM xSeries 330 7,073 31.77 US $ 12/17/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Ed. Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 12/17/01
5 Dell PowerEdge 6400/900 with PAweb120 6,622 25.70 US $ 12/19/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Ed. Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 12/19/01
6 Unisys e-@ction Enterprise Server ES5085R 5,745 69.00 US $ 03/05/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 03/05/01
7 PoweEdge 6400/700Mhz w/PA. Web 100 & PA. Cache 200 3,130 67.50 US $ 03/01/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 03/01/01
8 Unisys e-@ction Enterprise Server ES5085R (4P) 3,008 81.77 US $ 11/14/00 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 11/14/00
9 IBM Netfinity 5600 with Netfinity 6000R 1,262 277.08 US $ 08/01/00 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 07/01/00


Item Count 100,000
Rank Company System WIPS $/WIPS System Availability Database Operating System HTTP Server Date Submitted
1 e-@ction Enterprise Server ES 7000 (16P) 10,439 106.73 US $ 07/10/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 07/10/01
2 PowerEdge 6650 9,708 34.60 US $ 05/31/02 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 05/31/02
3 IBM eServer xSeries 430 with IBM Netfinity 4500R 7,554 136.80 US $ 06/08/01 IBM DB2 UDB 7.2 IBM ptx 4.6.1 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 05/01/01
4 NUMA-Q E410 6,272 195.59 US $ 02/02/01 IBM DB2 UDB 7.1 DYNIX/ptx 4.5.1 Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 02/02/01
5 IBM eServer xSeries 370 with xSeries 330 6,045 76.67 US $ 05/31/01 Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Microsoft Internet Information Server 5.0 05/31/01
========================================================================
http://www.tpc.org/tpcw/results/tpcw_perf_results.asp
的Web业务性能测试,微软的平台是全面领先的,即便是IBM,Oracle,也是搭配Windows+
IIS5+ASP来玩的,所谓的Bea,Oracle,IBM的的Web 服务器简直是垃圾.看来Java的Web性能还需要提高.

...全文
67 点赞 收藏 1
写回复
1 条回复
切换为时间正序
当前发帖距今超过3年,不再开放新的回复
发表回复
dmhorse 2003-09-26
The performance is still not the most important things to attractive us at least in my company.

Caze the M$ server cost too much.

Moveover,Tomcat,Apache can cater our goal, and none of projects need above 1000 cocurrence.
回复
发帖
Web 开发
创建于2007-09-28

8.0w+

社区成员

Java Web 开发
申请成为版主
帖子事件
创建了帖子
2003-09-26 11:49
社区公告
暂无公告