3月17日逻辑算法大赛战况,四名中国选手博得比赛前四名

zengyiCSTC 2004-03-17 03:13:07
Rank User School Country Score
1 Zhuo Zhang Tsinghua University China 165/240 (68.8%)
2 Jiqing Tang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Hong Kong 144/240 (60.0%)
3 Li Yue-ping Zhongshan University China 133/240 (55.4%)
4 Minghao Pan Zhejiang University China 130/240 (54.2%)
5 Albert Mao Duke University United States 127/240 (52.9%)
6 Galen Pickard MIT United States 122/240 (50.8%)
7 Dario Guzik Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina 121/240 (50.4%)
8 Xie Xianchao Beijing University China 119/240 (49.6%)
9 Slawomir Duszynski Politechnika Wroclawska Poland 118/240 (49.2%)
10 a b purdue university United States 99/240 (41.3%)
11 Vincent Lascaux Ecole Centrale Paris France 98/240 (40.8%)
12 Phong Dam Houston Community College United States 95/240 (39.6%)
13 Jeff Huang University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign United States 90/240 (37.5%)
14 YiMing Li Tsinghua University China 88/240 (36.7%)
15 Ren Tie'Nan Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astrnoutics China 87/240 (36.3%)
16 Guokun He South China University of Technology China 85/240 (35.4%)
17 Chao Ma University of science & technologe of China China 81/240 (33.8%)
18 Sergiu Cozub UTM Moldova 79/240 (32.9%)
19 Keith La Force Clemson University United States 77/240 (32.1%)
20 Chad Ferguson Illinois State University United States 75/240 (31.3%)
21 ? ? ???? China 75/240 (31.3%)
22 zhenbo chen ?????? China 75/240 (31.3%)
23 Du Hao Fudan University China 74/240 (30.8%)
24 Ruiyan Zhang South China University of Technology China 72/240 (30.0%)
25 Harish Venkataramani University of Massachusetts, Amherst United States 72/240 (30.0%)
26 chetan hs sphs India 70/240 (29.2%)
27 Dingming Guo Dalian University of Technology China 70/240 (29.2%)
28 Fan Hai peng National University of Defence technology China 70/240 (29.2%)
29 Andrey Mokhov Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University Kyrgyzstan 68/240 (28.3%)
30 Yifan Wang Tongji University China 66/240 (27.5%)
31 thzeg u lu ncue Taiwan 65/240 (27.1%)
32 Soumya Pati Nanyang Technological University Singapore 60/240 (25.0%)
33 ying_ji LI South China University of Technology China 60/240 (25.0%)
34 Ulan Degenbaev Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University Kyrgyzstan 56/240 (23.3%)
35 Alexis Prus Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina 56/240 (23.3%)
36 Shuyun Jian Sun Yat-Sen University China 55/240 (22.9%)
37 Trevor Foley LSU United States 54/240 (22.5%)
38 Andrew Tibbits Cornell University United States 51/240 (21.3%)
39 David Kaplan University of Illinois United States 50/240 (20.8%)
40 Alexander Zaigraev State Pedagogical University of Biysk Russian Federation 48/240 (20.0%)
41 Rodolfo Ribeiro Gomes UFES Brazil 47/240 (19.6%)
42 Jren-Chit Chin Iowa State University United States 46/240 (19.2%)
43 Brian Mathews Purdue United States 45/240 (18.8%)
44 Nguyen Kinh Luan Nanyang Technological University Singapore 45/240 (18.8%)
45 Lukasz Zarczynski Politechnika Wroclawska Poland 45/240 (18.8%)
46 Athanasios Souchlas UWO Canada 44/240 (18.3%)
47 Yujie Wang BHU China 44/240 (18.3%)
48 wu kaloc ZhongShan University China 43/240 (17.9%)
49 Dan Xie University of Waterloo Canada 42/240 (17.5%)
50 Daniel Cardoso UFPE Brazil 41/240 (17.1%)
51 Vitaliy Tsvayer Istanbul Technical University Turkey 41/240 (17.1%)
52 Adam Wardynski Technical University of Wroclaw Poland 41/240 (17.1%)
53 leo liang Sichuan University China 40/240 (16.7%)
54 Chi Zhang Tsinghua Univ. China 40/240 (16.7%)
55 Marcin Koltonowski Politechnika Wroclawska Poland 36/240 (15.0%)
56 Vilok Parekh SVCE India 36/240 (15.0%)
57 Marta Czyz Politechnika Wroclawska Poland 35/240 (14.6%)
58 aidong wang Chinese Academy of Sciences China 34/240 (14.2%)
59 Akiba Miura Kobe City College of Technology Japan 33/240 (13.8%)
60 S. C. UNLP Argentina 32/240 (13.3%)
61 Anthony Tisdale UCLA United States 31/240 (12.9%)
62 Jonathan Bowman BYU United States 30/240 (12.5%)
63 Hu Risheng Zhongshan University China 27/240 (11.3%)
64 Natalia Motoc USM Moldova 26/240 (10.8%)
65 Mattias Sandsäter Chalmers Sweden 26/240 (10.8%)
66 Matthew Schwaberow The Ohio State University United States 25/240 (10.4%)
67 John Rizzo University of North Texas United States 25/240 (10.4%)
68 Kevin Durdle University of Western Ontario Canada 25/240 (10.4%)
69 Zhong Shi NTIT China 24/240 (10.0%)
70 Linh Truong Salt Lake Community College United States 24/240 (10.0%)
71 Xie Chongyang South China University of Technology China 24/240 (10.0%)
72 Timo Hirvonen Joensuun lyseon lukio Finland 23/240 (9.6%)
73 Andy Fu South China University of Technology China 23/240 (9.6%)
74 Bo Yang Harbin Institute of Technology China 23/240 (9.6%)
75 Huirong Shi Northwestern Polytechnical Univesity China 22/240 (9.2%)
76 ji yan University of British Columbia Canada 21/240 (8.8%)
77 Peng Wu Beihang University China 20/240 (8.3%)
78 Mieszko Wiktorski Technical University of Wroclaw Poland 20/240 (8.3%)
79 Vineet Seth Sir M. Visvesvaraya Institue of Technology India 16/240 (6.7%)
80 Mike Burr Pine Creek High School United States 16/240 (6.7%)
81 YiQiang Mao Zhejiang University China 15/240 (6.3%)
82 Yuto Takei Kaijo Junior High School Japan 15/240 (6.3%)
83 liu shenling National Universty of Denfence Technology China 15/240 (6.3%)
84 chris childers artifact United States 14/240 (5.8%)
85 Wiennat Mongkulmann Horwang School Thailand 14/240 (5.8%)
86 Andreas Papathanasis University of Athens, Physics dept. Greece 9/240 (3.8%)
87 Mateusz Wosinski Technical University of Lodz Poland 7/240 (2.9%)
88 Fu Xinfa Shanghai MariimeUniversity China 6/240 (2.5%)
89 Guilherme Botelho Diniz Junqueira Universidade de Sao Paulo Brazil 5/240 (2.1%)
90 Katarzyna Musial Politechnika Wroclawska Poland 5/240 (2.1%)
91 Zahary Karadjov FMI Bulgaria 4/240 (1.7%)
92 Lv Xiangyu BUPT China 4/240 (1.7%)
93 Cesar Neves ISEP Portugal 3/240 (1.3%)
94 Amy Seng Princeton University United States 1/240 (0.4%)
95 Emilian Baragan Faculty of Computer Science,Iasi Romania -9/240 (-3.8%)
...全文
201 6 打赏 收藏 转发到动态 举报
写回复
用AI写文章
6 条回复
切换为时间正序
请发表友善的回复…
发表回复
mrfan 2004-03-21
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
是啊,那法国人肯定只错了一道难题------猛!希望国内能超过.
hifrog 2004-03-20
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
这是排行链接:
http://www.imaginecup.com/leaguetable.aspx
有一个法国人很猛:
1 Vincent Lascaux Ecole Centrale Paris France 225/240 (93.8%)
BigF 2004-03-18
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
我也找不到题目啊,谁能给个链接啊
zengyiCSTC 2004-03-18
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
登陆后请到算法页面左上角找到
Take the algorithm quiz!
andyforever 2004-03-17
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
我也报名了的说
gnefuil 2004-03-17
  • 打赏
  • 举报
回复
已经开始比了?偶都忘记了
偶sign in了,怎么找不到题目啊?
  在有关算法的书中,有一些叙述非常严谨,但不够全面;另一些涉及了大量的题材,但又缺乏严谨性。本书将严谨性和全面性融为一体,深入讨论各类算法,并着力使这些算法的设计和分析能为各个层次的读者接受。全书各章自成体系,可以作为独立的学习单元;算法以英语和伪代码的形式描述,具备初步程序设计经验的人就能看懂;说明和解释力求浅显易懂,不失深度和数学严谨性。 《算法导论(原书第3版)》选材经典、内容丰富、结构合理、逻辑清晰,对本科生的数据结构课程和研究生的算法课程都是非常实用的教材,在it专业人员的职业生涯中,本书也是一本案头必备的参考书或工程实践手册。    第3版的主要变化:    新增了van emde boas树和多线程算法,并且将矩阵基础移至附录。    修订了递归式(现在称为“分治策略”)那一章的内容,更广泛地覆盖分治法。    移除两章很少讲授的内容:二项堆和排序网络。    修订了动态规划和贪心算法相关内容。    流网络相关材料现在基于边上的全部流。    由于关于矩阵基础和strassen算法的材料移到了其他章,矩阵运算这一章的内容所占篇幅更小。    修改了对knuth-morris-pratt字符串匹配算法的讨论。    新增100道练习和28道思考题,还更新并补充了参考文献。
作者:July、阿财。 时间:二零一一年十十三。 ------------------------------ 无私分享造就开源的辉煌。 今是二零一一年十十三,明14即是本人刚好开博一周年。在一周年之际,特此分享出微软面试 全部100题答案的完整版,以作为对本博客所有读者的回馈。 一年之的1014,一个名叫July 的人在一个叫csdn 的论坛上开帖分享微软等公司数据结构+算法 面试100题,自此,与上千网友一起做,一起思考,一起解答这些面试题目,最终成就了一个名为:结构之法 算法之道的编程面试与算法研究并重的博客,如今,此博客影响力逐步渗透到海外,及至到整个互联网。 在此之,由于本人笨拙,这微软面试100题的答案只整理到了60题(第1-60题答案可到本人资源下 载处下载:http://v_july_v.download.csdn.net/),故此,常有朋友留言或来信询问后面40题的答案。只是 因个人认为:一、答案只是作为一个参考,不可太过依赖;二、常常因一些事情耽搁(如在整理最新的今年 九、十份的面试题:九腾讯,创新工场,淘宝等公司最新面试十三题、十百度,阿里巴巴,迅雷搜狗 最新面试十一题);三、个人正在针对那100题一题一题的写文章,多种思路,不断优化,即成程序员编程 艺术系列。自此,后面40题的答案迟迟未得整理。且个人已经整理的60题的答案,在我看来,是有诸多问 题与弊端的,甚至很多答案都是错误的。 互联网总是能给人带来惊喜。,一位现居美国加州的名叫阿财的朋友发来一封邮件,并把他自己 做的全部100题的答案一并发予给我,自此,便似遇见了知己。十分感谢。 任何东西只有分享出来才更显其价值。本只需贴出后面40题的答案,因为60题的答案本人早已整理上 传至网上,但多一种思路多一种参考亦未尝不可。特此,把阿财的答案再稍加整理番,然后把全部100题的答 案现今都贴出来。若有任何问题,欢迎不吝指正。谢谢。 上千上万的人都关注过此100题,且大都都各自贡献了自己的思路,或回复于微软100题维护地址上,或 回复于本博客内,人数众多,无法一一标明,特此向他们诸位表示敬意和感谢。谢谢大家,诸君的努力足以影 响整个互联网,咱们已经迎来一个分享互利的新时代。 感谢诸君,请享用.....

250

社区成员

发帖
与我相关
我的任务
社区描述
其他产品/厂家
社区管理员
  • 其他
加入社区
  • 近7日
  • 近30日
  • 至今
社区公告
暂无公告

试试用AI创作助手写篇文章吧