反对vcvj处理FAQ事件可能有的徇私舞弊
vcvj一下子添加了10个FAQ,本无可厚非
基本上都是自己提交的自己审理
主要解答者是别人,也就算了,最多算热心
主要解答者是自己的话,是不是要衡量一下
Java Web Services / XML 又不是只有一个版主,再说了大版也可以审理的
看看你自己的回复,大家说说觉得主要解答者应该是你么?
http://community.csdn.net/Expert/FAQ/FAQ_Index.asp?id=210900
回复人: vcvj([呆]福州ing, [想]去Singapore, Saving $ 4 cars) ( ) 信誉:179 2005-7-25 12:48:58 得分: 10
may you should return a xml with whole records which you should define by yourself.
you could consider that the xml file includes the information whole fields
http://community.csdn.net/Expert/FAQ/FAQ_Index.asp?id=210901
回复人: vcvj([呆]福州ing, [想]去Singapore, Saving $ 4 cars) ( ) 信誉:156 2005-7-12 9:20:34 得分: 10
A server on server side, which only response xml information from client's requirement with responsibility for.
N clients on client side, which require your condition to the server and receive xml datas via Xmlhttp;
as far as how to implement client side, plz refer to javascript and xmlhttp.
我想vcvj是不是应该出来有个说法,希望以后主要解答者是自己的FAQ审理要严格点
大版们也不看看FAQ的审理的,就任由这种现象泛滥?分数给最后一个支持本次反对的人